We describe five quantum mechanics experiments that have been designed for an undergraduate setting. The experiments use correlated photons produced by parametric down conversion to generate interference patterns in interferometers. The photons are counted individually. The experimental results illustrate the consequences of multiple paths, indistinguishability, and entanglement. We analyze the results quantitatively using plane-wave probability amplitudes combined according to Feynman’s rules, the state-vector formalism, and amplitude packets. The apparatus fits on a $2\u2032\xd74\u2032$ optical breadboard.

## REFERENCES

1.

*The Physics of Quantum Information*, edited by D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger (Springer, Berlin, 2000).

2.

D.

Dehlinger

and M. W.

Mitchell

, “Entangled photon apparatus for the undergraduate laboratory

,” Am. J. Phys.

70

, 898

–902

(2002

);D.

Dehlinger

and M. W.

Mitchell

, , “Entangled photons, nonlocality, and Bell inequalities in the undergraduate laboratory

,” Am. J. Phys.

70

, 903

–910

(2002

).3.

C. H.

Holbrow

, E. J.

Galvez

, and M. E.

Parks

, “Photon quantum mechanics and beam splitters

,” Am. J. Phys.

70

, 260

–265

(2002

).4.

Richard P. Feyman,

*QED, The Strange Theory of Light and Matter*(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1985).5.

S.

Friedberg

, C. K.

Hong

, and L.

Mandel

, “Measurement of time delays in the parametric production of photon pairs

,” Phys. Rev. Lett.

54

, 2011

–2013

(1985

).6.

Single Photon Counting Module SPCM-AQR Series, Perkin Elmer Optoelectronics product report (Perkin Elmer, Vaudreuil, 2001).

7.

Since we completed this work, the available power levels for the 400–410 nm diode lasers have risen to 50 mW. In addition, new diode lasers at 375 nm have become available.

8.

If the initial propagation direction is (1,0,0), with polarization along (0,0,1), then a sequence of mirrors that send the beam consecutively through the directions (0,0,1), (0,1,0), (1,0,0) rotates the polarization by $90\xb0.$ Omitting the last step allows the same rotation when steering the beam into the (0,1,0) direction.

9.

For more information, see <http://departments.colgate.edu/physics/pql.htm>.

10.

R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands,

*The Feynman Lectures on Physics*(Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1965), Vol. 3, p. 1-1.11.

Note that $eikl$ is an example of Feynman’s formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of the action: $ei\u222bpdx/\u210f.$ See R. P. Feynman,

*The Theory of Fundamental Processes*(W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1962).12.

We use $\delta j=nkjlj\u2243kjlj$ because $n\u22431$ for experiments done in air.

13.

D. M.

Greenberger

, M. A.

Horne

, and A.

Zeilinger

, “Multiparticle interferometry and the superposition principle

,” Phys. Today

46

(8

), 22

–29

(1993

).14.

In this case the π/2 relative phase between $r$ and $t$ yields $P(\delta )=2RT[1\u2212cos\u200a\delta ].$

15.

The pattern of the maxima and minima will be the same for tagged photons as for untagged photons. A tagged photon, however, is a special case of a biphoton which is discussed later, and its pattern of partial interference is not the same as that of an untagged photon.

16.

We fit the data using the “solver” option of Excel, minimizing the reduced $\chi 2.$ The errors were calculated using the $\chi 2+1$ criterion. K. E. Schalm, “Least-squares fits to an arbitrary function using Excel,” (handout for PHY 445/PHY 515 Advanced Laboratory course at SUNY, Stony Brook, 9/18/95, unpublished).

17.

P. A. M. Dirac,

*The Principles of Quantum Mechanics*(Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1958), p. 9.18.

R.

Ghosh

, C. K.

Hong

, Z. Y.

Ou

, and L.

Mandel

, “Interference of two photons in parametric down conversion

,” Phys. Rev. A

34

, 3962

–3968

(1986

).19.

C. K.

Hong

, Z. Y.

Ou

, and L.

Mandel

, “Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference

,” Phys. Rev. Lett.

59

, 2044

–2046

(1987

).20.

P. G.

Kwiat

and R. Y.

Chiao

, “Observation of a nonclassical Berry’s phase for the photon

,” Phys. Rev. Lett.

66

, 588

–591

(1991

).21.

E.

Mohler

, J.

Brendel

, R.

Lange

, and W.

Martienssen

, “Finesse and resolution enhancement in two-photon interferometry

,” Europhys. Lett.

8

, 511

–516

(1989

).22.

J.

Brendel

, E.

Mohler

, and W.

Martienssen

, “Time-resolved dual-beam two-photon interferences with high visibility

,” Phys. Rev. Lett.

66

, 1142

–1145

(1991

).23.

Due to the better alignment and simpler optical arrangement that we can obtain in the experiment with collinear photons, the coincidence yield is much higher than in the experiments with the noncollinear photons.

24.

Notice that the result is just the square of the result for one-photon interference. In other words, the interference pattern of the biphoton is the product of the interference patterns of single photons.

25.

We detect coincidences at the interferometer output by placing a beam splitter there with reflectance $R\u2032$ and transmittance $T\u2032$ and then detecting coincidences between photons leaving each output. This arrangement allows us to detect only $2R\u2032T\u2032$ of the photon pairs leaving the interferometer.

26.

R. A.

Campos

, B. E. A.

Saleh

, and M. A.

Teich

, “Fourth-order interference of joint single-photon wavepackets in lossless optical systems

,” Phys. Rev. A

42

, 4127

–4137

(1990

).27.

Roy J.

Glauber

, “Dirac’s famous dictum on interference: One photon or two?

,” Am. J. Phys.

63

, 12

(L) (1990

). We thank H. Leff for bringing this reference to our attention.28.

P. D. D.

Schwindt

, P. G.

Kwiat

, and B.-G.

Englert

, “Quantitative wave-particle duality and nonerasing quantum erasure

,” Phys. Rev. A

60

, 4285

–4290

(1999

).29.

M. B.

Schneider

and I. A.

LaPuma

, “A simple experiment for discussion of quantum interference and which-way measurement

,” Am. J. Phys.

70

, 266

–271

(2002

).30.

C. H. Holbrow, J. N. Lloyd, and J. C. Amato,

*Modern Introductory Physics*(Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999).31.

G. Greenstein and A. G. Zajonc,

*The Quantum Challenge*(Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, 1987).32.

P.

Grangier

, G.

Roger

, and A.

Aspect

, “Experimental evidence for a photon anticorrelation effect on a beam splitter: A new light on single-photon interferences

,” Europhys. Lett.

1

, 173

–179

(1986

).33.

J. J.

Thorn

, M. S.

Neel

, V. W.

Donato

, G. S.

Bergreen

, R. E.

Davies

, and M.

Beck

, “Observing the quantum behavior of light in an undergraduate laboratory

,” Am. J. Phys.

72

, 1210

–1219

(2004

).34.

K.

Kato

, “Second harmonic generation of 2048 Å $\beta -BaB2O4,$

” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.

QE-22

, 1013

–1014

(1986

).
This content is only available via PDF.

© 2005 American Association of Physics Teachers.

2005

American Association of Physics Teachers

AAPT members receive access to the

*American Journal of Physics*and*The Physics Teacher*as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.