We examined normalized gains and preinstruction scores on the force concept inventory (FCI) for students in interactive engagement courses in introductory mechanics at four universities and found a significant, positive correlation for three of them. We also examined class average FCI scores of 2948 students in 38 interactive engagement classes, 31 of which were from the same four universities and 7 of which came from 3 other schools. We found a significant, positive correlation between class average normalized FCI gains and class average preinstruction scores. To probe this correlation, we administered Lawson’s classroom test of scientific reasoning to 65 students and found a significant, positive correlation between these students’ normalized FCI gains and their Lawson test scores. This correlation is even stronger than the correlation between FCI gains and preinstruction FCI scores. Our study demonstrates that differences in student populations are important when comparing normalized gains in different interactive engagement classes. We suggest using the Lawson test along with the FCI to measure the effectiveness of alternative interactive engagement strategies.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2005
PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH SECTION|
December 01 2005
Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability
Vincent P. Coletta;
Vincent P. Coletta
a)
Department of Physics,
Loyola Marymount University
, Los Angeles, California 90045
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeffrey A. Phillips
Jeffrey A. Phillips
Department of Physics,
Loyola Marymount University
, Los Angeles, California 90045
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
Am. J. Phys. 73, 1172–1182 (2005)
Article history
Received:
April 02 2004
Accepted:
September 09 2005
Citation
Vincent P. Coletta, Jeffrey A. Phillips; Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability. Am. J. Phys. 1 December 2005; 73 (12): 1172–1182. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2117109
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A simple model of a gravitational lens from geometric optics
Bogdan Szafraniec, James F. Harford
Playing with active matter
Angelo Barona Balda, Aykut Argun, et al.
The physics of “everesting” on a bicycle
Martin Bier
Why is there no Poisson spot in a solar eclipse?
Jami J. Kinnunen
Related Content
The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores
American Journal of Physics (December 2002)
Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics
American Journal of Physics (December 1980)
Predicting FCI gain with a nonverbal intelligence test
AIP Conference Proceedings (January 2013)
What course elements correlate with improvement on tests in introductory Newtonian mechanics?
Am. J. Phys. (August 2009)
The effect of multiple internal representations on context-rich instruction
Am. J. Phys. (November 2007)