Previous research indicates significant improvement in student conceptual understanding of physics topics after instruction with Tutorials in Introductory Physics at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. However, assessment of the effectiveness of tutorials at other institutions is crucial. We conducted such a field test at the United States Air Force Academy, Colorado. Students using the tutorials were compared to students using the standard curriculum, students using tutorial pretests only, and students in the honors program. Assessment was based on conceptual questions involving induced current and force. Our results show that students using the tutorials in a modified setting outperformed the control group and rose to the level of performance of the honors students. Our analysis of student reasoning indicates areas where further development of the tutorials is warranted.

1.
Lillian C.
McDermott
,
Peter S.
Shaffer
and the Physics Education Group, Department of Physics, University of Washington,
Tutorials in Introductory Physics
(
Prentice-Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ,
1998
). Preliminary ed.
2.
K.
Grugen
, “
Social construction in the education process
,” in
Constructivism in Education
, edited by
L. P.
Steffe
and
J.
Gale
(
Lawrence Erlbaum
, Hillsdale,
1995
).
3.
P. S.
Shaffer
and
P. R. L.
Heron
(private communication).
4.
Information on the development and assessment of the tutorials can be found in a series of articles.
T.
O’Brien
,
S.
Vokos
, and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
The challenge of matching learning assessments to teaching goals: An example from the work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
153
156
(
1998
).
L. C.
McDermott
,
P.
Shaffer
, and
M.
Summers
, “
Research as a guide for teaching introductory mechanics: An illustration in the context of the Atwood’s machine
,”
Am. J. Phys.
62
,
52
54
(
1994
).
P.
Shaffer
and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II: Design of instructional strategies
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
,
1003
1013
(
1992
).
B.
Ambrose
and
P.
Heron
, “
Student understanding of light as an electromagnetic wave: Relating the formalism to physical phenomena
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
891
898
(
1999
).
K.
Wosilait
,
P.
Heron
,
P.
Shaffer
, and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Addressing student difficulties in applying a wave model to the interference and diffraction of light
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
(
7
),
S5
S15
(
1999
).
5.
H. Mauk
Gruner
, “
A study of the cognitive and affective impact of the cockpit physics curriculum on students at the United States Air Force Academy
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Physics,
Kansas State University
,
1997
(unpublished).
L.
Hoff
, “
From omnipotent teacher-in-charge to the co-conspirator in the classroom: Developing lifelong readers and writers
,”
Eng. J.
83
(
6
),
42
50
(
1994
);
D.
Hurst
, “
Teaching technology to teachers
,”
Educational Leadership
51
,
74
76
(
1994
).
A.
O’Donnell
, “
Effects of explicit incentives on scripted and unscripted cooperation
,”
Br. J. Educ. Psychol.
88
(
1
),
74
86
(
1996
).
6.
K.
Wosilait
,
P.
Heron
,
P.
Shaffer
, and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Development of a research-based tutorial on light and shadow
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
(
10
),
906
913
(
1998
).
7.
T.
O’Brien
,
S.
Vokos
, and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
The challenge of matching learning assessments to teaching goals: An example from the work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
147
156
(
1998
);
C.
Thaiss
,
The Harcourt Brace Guide to Writing Across the Curriculum
(
Harcourt Brace
, New York,
1998
).
8.
R.
Felder
, “
Active learning: Who said it was easy?
,”
Focus on Faculty
4
(
2
),
1
2
(
1996
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.