The Fraunhofer diffraction of a Gaussian wave field incident on a thin wire is examined. It is shown theoretically and experimentally that a simple application of Babinet’s principle leads to erroneous results.

1.
M.
Babinet
, “
Mémoires d’optique météorologique
,”
C. R. Acad. Sci.
4
,
638
648
(
1837
).
2.
Jurgen R. Mayer-Arendt, Introduction to Classical and Modern Optics (Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1972), p. 162.
3.
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifchitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon, Oxford, 1962), pp. 176–178.
4.
D. W. Tenquist, R. M. Whittle, and J. Yarwood, University Optics (Iliffe Books, London, 1970), Vol. 2, p. 275.
5.
T. B.
Greenslade
, Jr.
, “
Diffraction by a cat’s whisker
,”
Phys. Teach.
38
,
422
(
2000
).
6.
S. M.
Curry
and
A. L.
Shawlow
, “
Measuring the diameter of a hair by diffraction
,”
Am. J. Phys.
42
,
412
413
(
1974
).
7.
Joseph W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968), pp. 57–62.
8.
Arnold Sommerfeld, Optics (Academic, New York, 1954), pp. 204–205.
9.
Max Born and Emil Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon, London, 1959), p. 380.
10.
J. R.
Jiménez
and
E.
Hita
, “
Babinet’s principle in scalar theory of diffraction
,”
Opt. Rev.
8
,
495
497
(
2001
).
11.
Reference 7, Chaps. 2 and 4.
12.
Reference 7, pp. 62–63.
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.