This paper is an introduction to the ideas of Bohmian mechanics, an interpretation of quantum mechanics in which the observer plays no fundamental role. Bohmian mechanics describes, instead of probabilities of measurement results, objective microscopic events. In recent years, Bohmian mechanics has attracted increasing attention by researchers. The form of a dialogue allows me to address questions about the Bohmian view that often arise.

1.
K.
Berndl
,
D.
Dürr
,
S.
Goldstein
,
G.
Peruzzi
, and
N.
Zanghı̀
, “
On the global existence of Bohmian mechanics
,”
Commun. Math. Phys.
173
,
647
673
(
1995
).
2.
D.
Dürr
,
S.
Goldstein
, and
N.
Zanghı̀
, “
Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty
,”
J. Stat. Phys.
67
,
843
907
(
1992
),
arXiv.org/quant-ph/0308039.
3.
J. S.
Bell
, “
De Broglie–Bohm, delayed-choice double-slit experiments, and density matrix
,”
Int. J. Quantum Chem.
14
,
155
159
(
1980
). Reprinted in Ref. 7, p. 111.
4.
D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory (Routledge, London, 1993).
5.
S.
Goldstein
, “
Quantum theory without observers: Part one
,”
Phys. Today
51
(
3
),
42
46
(
1998
);
S.
Goldstein
, “
Quantum theory without observers: Part two
,”
Phys. Today
51
(
4
),
38
42
(
1998
).
6.
W.
Heisenberg
, “
Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik
,”
Z. Phys.
43
,
172
198
(
1927
).
English translation in Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Princeton U.P., Princeton, 1983), pp. 62–87.
7.
J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1987).
8.
P. Ehrenfest and T. Ehrenfest, “Begriffliche Grundlagen der statistischen Auffassung in der Mechanik,” (1911) in Enzyklopädie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. IV-4, Art. 32 (Teubner, Leipzig, 1917).
9.
D.
Bohm
, “
A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. I
,”
Phys. Rev.
85
,
166
179
(
1952
);
D.
Bohm
, “
A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. II
,”
Phys. Rev.
85
,
180
193
(
1952
).
10.
Electrons and Photons: The Proceedings of the Fifth Solvay Congress (1927), translated and edited by G. Bacciagaluppi and A. Valentini (Cambridge U.P., in press).
11.
J. T. Cushing, Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994).
12.
S. Goldstein, “Bohmian mechanics,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, published online by Stanford University 〈http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/qm-bohm/〉.
13.
K.
Berndl
,
M.
Daumer
,
D.
Dürr
,
S.
Goldstein
, and
N.
Zanghı̀
, “
A survey of Bohmian mechanics
,”
Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis.
110B
,
737
750
(
1995
).
14.
D.
Dürr
,
S.
Goldstein
, and
N.
Zanghı̀
, “
Quantum equilibrium and the role of operators as observables in quantum theory
,”
J. Stat. Phys.
116,
959
1055
(
2004
),
arXiv.org/quant-ph/0308038.
15.
D.
Dürr
,
S.
Goldstein
,
R.
Tumulka
, and
N.
Zanghı̀
, “Bohmian mechanics and quantum field theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published),arXiv.org/quant-ph/0303156.
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.