While the classical, wavelike behavior of light (interference and diffraction) has been easily observed in undergraduate laboratories for many years, explicit observation of the quantum nature of light (i.e., photons) is much more difficult. For example, while well-known phenomena such as the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering strongly suggest the existence of photons, they are not definitive proof of their existence. Here we present an experiment, suitable for an undergraduate laboratory, that unequivocally demonstrates the quantum nature of light. Spontaneously downconverted light is incident on a beamsplitter and the outputs are monitored with single-photon counting detectors. We observe a near absence of coincidence counts between the two detectors—a result inconsistent with a classical wave model of light, but consistent with a quantum description in which individual photons are incident on the beamsplitter. More explicitly, we measured the degree of second-order coherence between the outputs to be g(2)(0)=0.0177±0.0026, which violates the classical inequality g(2)(0)⩾1 by 377 standard deviations.

1.
R. Q.
Stanley
, “
Question #45: What (if anything) does the photoelectric effect teach us?
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
,
839
(
1996
).
2.
P. W.
Milonni
, “
Answer to Question #45: What (if anything) does the photoelectric effect teach us?
,”
Am. J. Phys.
65
,
11
12
(
1997
).
3.
W. E. Lamb, Jr. and M. O. Scully, “The photoelectric effect without photons,” in Polarization, Matière et Rayonnement (Presses University de France, Paris, 1969).
4.
L. Mandel, “The case for and against semiclassical radiation theory,” in Progress in Optics, edited by E. Wolf (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976), Vol. XIII, pp. 27–68.
5.
D. C.
Burnham
and
D. L.
Weinberg
, “
Observation of simultaneity in parametric production of optical photon pairs
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
25
,
84
87
(
1970
).
6.
J. F.
Clauser
, “
Experimental distinction between the quantum and classical field-theoretic predictions for the photoelectric effect
,”
Phys. Rev. D
9
,
853
860
(
1974
).
7.
H. J.
Kimble
,
M.
Dagenais
, and
L.
Mandel
, “
Photon antibunching in resonance fluorescence
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
39
,
691
695
(
1977
).
8.
A. C.
Funk
and
M.
Beck
, “
Sub-Poissonian photocurrent statistics: Theory and undergraduate experiment
,”
Am. J. Phys.
65
,
492
500
(
1997
).
9.
D.
Dehlinger
and
M. W.
Mitchell
, “
Entangled photon apparatus for the undergraduate laboratory
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
898
902
(
2002
).
10.
D.
Dehlinger
and
M. W.
Mitchell
, “
Entangled photons, nonlocality, and Bell inequalities in the undergraduate laboratory
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
903
910
(
2002
).
11.
P.
Grangier
,
G.
Roger
, and
A.
Aspect
, “
Experimental evidence for a photon anticorrelation effect on a beam splitter: A new light on single-photon interferences
,”
Europhys. Lett.
1
,
173
179
(
1986
).
12.
G. Greenstein and A. G. Zajonc, The Quantum Challenge, Modern Research on the Foundations of Quantum Theory (Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, 1997).
13.
R.
Hanbury Brown
and
R. Q.
Twiss
, “
Correlation between photons in two coherent beams of light
,”
Nature (London)
177
,
27
29
(
1956
).
14.
An excellent compilation of reprints, including many of the articles referenced here, is L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Selected Papers on Coherence and Fluctuations of Light (1850–1966) (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 1990).
15.
R.
Hanbury Brown
and
R. Q.
Twiss
, “
A test of a new type of stellar interferometer on Sirius
,”
Nature (London)
178
,
1046
1048
(
1956
).
16.
E.
Brannen
and
H. I. S.
Ferguson
, “
The question of correlation between photons in coherent light rays
,”
Nature (London)
178
,
481
482
(
1956
).
17.
E. M.
Purcell
, “
The question of correlation between photons in coherent light rays
,”
Nature (London)
178
,
1449
1450
(
1956
).
18.
R.
Hanbury Brown
and
R. Q.
Twiss
, “
Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light I. Basic theory: the correlation between photons in coherent beams of radiation
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
242
,
300
324
(
1957
).
19.
R. Q.
Twiss
,
A. G.
Little
, and
R.
Hanbury Brown
, “
Correlation between photons in coherent beams of light, detected by a coincidence counting technique
,”
Nature (London)
180
,
324
326
(
1957
).
20.
R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light, 3rd ed. (Clarendon, Oxford, 2000).
21.
A way to motivate the validity of this inequality is to note that the variance of the intensity must be a positive number. Since the variance can be written as ΔI2=〈I2〉−〈I〉2⩾0, it must be true that 〈I2〉⩾〈I〉2.
22.
F. T.
Arecchi
,
E.
Gatti
, and
A.
Sona
, “
Time distribution of photons from coherent and Gaussian sources
,”
Phys. Lett.
20
,
27
29
(
1966
).
23.
L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1995).
24.
P. L.
Kelly
and
W. H.
Kleiner
, “
Theory of electromagnetic field measurement and photoelectron counting
,”
Phys. Rev.
136
,
A316
A334
(
1964
).
25.
R. J. Glauber, “Optical coherence and photon statistics,” in Quantum Optics and Electronics, edited by C. DeWitt-Morett, A. Blandin, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965), pp. 63–185.
26.
Z. Y.
Ou
,
C. K.
Hong
, and
L.
Mandel
, “
Relation between input and output states for a beamsplitter
,”
Opt. Commun.
63
,
118
122
(
1987
).
27.
〈http://www.whitman.edu/∼beckmk/QM/〉
28.
C. K.
Hong
,
Z. Y.
Ou
, and
L.
Mandel
, “
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
59
,
2044
2046
(
1987
).
29.
C. H.
Holbrow
,
E.
Galvez
, and
M. E.
Parks
, “
Photon quantum mechanics and beamsplitters
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
260
265
(
2002
).
30.
E. J. Galvez et al., personal communication, 2004.
31.
S.
Friberg
,
C. K.
Hong
, and
L.
Mandel
, “
Measurement of time delays in the parametric production of photon pairs
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
54
,
2011
2013
(
1985
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.