A simple quantitative analysis of the classic inertia ball demonstration explains why the lower string may break for “jerks” weaker than those that normally break the upper string, and why both strings may break—first the lower, then the upper.

1.
R. M. Sutton, Demonstration Experiments in Physics (McGraw–Hill, New York, London, 1938), Experiments M-100 and M-101, pp. 46–47.
2.
G. D. Freier and F. J. Anderson, A Demonstration Handbook for Physics (AAPT, College Park, MD, 1996), 3rd ed., Demonstration Mc-2, p. M-16.
3.
The Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demonstrations (The Education Group & Associates, Los Angeles, CA, 1992), Disc 2, Chap. 5, Demo 02-13, “Inertia Ball.”
4.
This demonstration is described at 〈faraday.physics.uiowa.edu/mech/1F20.10.htm〉 and 〈www.physics.brown.edu/Studies/Demo/solids/demos/1f2010.html〉.
5.
P.
LeCorbeiller
, “
A classical experiment illustrating the notion of ‘jerk,’ 
Am. J. Phys.
13
(
3
),
156
158
(
1945
).
6.
P.
LeCorbeiller
, “
A classical experiment illustrating the notion of ‘jerk,’ 
Am. J. Phys.
14
(
1
),
64
65
(
1946
).
7.
F. G.
Karioris
, “
Inertia demonstration revisited
,”
Am. J. Phys.
46
(
7
),
710
713
(
1978
).
This paper uses a more complicated model in which the driving force is sinusoidal and is described by its frequency as well as its amplitude. The jerk variable, equivalent to our α, is neither constant nor explicit, but this model does introduce a possible resonance phenomenon.
8.
M. A.
Heald
and
G. M.
Caplan
, “
Which string breaks?
,”
Phys. Teach.
34
(
8
),
504
507
(
1996
).
9.
T. R.
Sandin
, “
The jerk
,”
Phys. Teach.
28
(
1
),
36
40
(
1990
).
10.
The agent supplying Fappl is assumed to move in such a way as to produce the linear-ramp tension in the lower string. In Ref. 8 we considered an alternative model in which the lower end of the lower string is displaced linearly with time, producing a more complicated T(t) in that string, and adding a dependence on the elastic constant of the lower string. Note also that the two strings or wires of the same material will have different spring constants k unless they are of the same length.
11.
A function of the form sin(u)/u, familiar from the theory of single-slit diffraction, is often called the sinc function and is the spherical Bessel function of order zero.
12.
We thank John S. Wallingford (private communication) for suggesting this form of display. See http://www.smnet.net/jwally/.
13.
Like Eq. (9), Eq. (13) also has multiple solutions for small γ. There are narrow strips, just within the anomalous zone boundaries in Fig. 2, within which the sequential breaking occurs. These strips are too narrow to show in the figure and are unlikely to be observable experimentally.
14.
The proper equation is given in Ref. 5 for the special case of γ=0.5. Reference 6 attempts to generalize to arbitrary γ and gives an equation equivalent to our Eq. (13), but with γ2 rather than (1−γ)2 on the right-hand side.
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.