When the appropriate mass is used to oscillate a spring, the vertical oscillations couple to a pendular swing. Previous calculations of various aspects of this resonance assumed a massless spring as a simple pendulum. This paper improves the estimate of the mass necessary to induce this resonance by describing a massive spring as a physical pendulum and obtains an expression for the mass in terms of the spring constant and various lengths associated with the spring. Several approximations will be considered to simplify the complete expression. Comparisons of the predictive power of these expressions are made for various values of the spring constants. An Appendix discusses the assumption of uniform coil density of a hanging massive spring.
REFERENCES
1.
M. G.
Olsson
, “Why does a mass on a string sometimes misbehave?
,” Am. J. Phys.
44
(12
), 1211
–1212
(1976
).2.
H. M.
Lai
, “On the recurrence phenomenon of a resonant spring pendulum
,” Am. J. Phys.
52
(3
), 219
–223
(1984
).3.
W. R.
Mellen
, “Spring string swing thing
,” Phys. Teach.
32
, 122
–123
(1994
).4.
D. E.
Holzwarth
and J.
Malone
, “Pendulum period versus hanging-spring period
,” Phys. Teach.
38
, 47
(2000
).5.
Equation (25) in Ref. 2 for the period with which the energy oscillates between these modes involves elliptical integrals of the first kind, even for the case of a massless spring as a simple pendulum.
6.
E. E.
Galloni
and M.
Kohen
, “Influence of the mass of the spring on its static and dynamic effects
,” Am. J. Phys.
47
(12
), 1076
–1078
(1979
).7.
S. Y.
Mak
, “The static effectiveness mass of a slinky
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
(11
), 994
–997
(1987
).See also
P. K.
Glanz
, “Note on energy changes in a spring
,” Am. J. Phys.
47
(12
), 1091
–1092
(1979
) for a discussion of the effect of pre-loading a spring on the conservation of energy.8.
T. C.
Heard
and N. D.
Newby
, Jr., “Behavior of a soft spring
,” Am. J. Phys.
45
(11
), 1102
–1106
(1977
). See especially Eq. (20).9.
J. T.
Cushing
, “The spring-mass system revisited
,” Am. J. Phys.
52
(10
), 925
–937
(1984
). See footnote 16.10.
R.
Weinstock
, “Spring-mass correction in uniform circular motion
,” Am. J. Phys.
32
(5
), 370
–376
(1964
).See also
M.
Parkinson
, “Spring-mass correction
,” Am. J. Phys.
33
(4
), 341
–342
(1965
) for the same result from iterative methods rather than differential equations.11.
R. J. Stephenson, Mechanics and Properties of Matter (Wiley, New York, 1952), pp. 113–114.
See also
L.
Ruby
, “Equivalent mass of a coil spring
,” Phys. Teach.
38
, 140
–141
(2000
) for the same result from iterative methods to avoid the calculus for an algebra-based course. Ruby also attempts a simplified nonuniform approximation, but incorrectly relates Mak’s (Ref. 7) static correction to his dynamic correction.12.
R.
Weinstock
, “Oscillations of a particle attached to a heavy spring: An application of the Stieltjes integral
,” Am. J. Phys.
47
(6
), 508
–514
(1979
).13.
F. A.
McDonald
, “Deceptively simple harmonic motion: A mass on a spiral spring
,” Am. J. Phys.
48
(3
), 189
–192
(1980
).14.
J. M.
Bowen
, “Slinky oscillations and the motion of effective mass
,” Am. J. Phys.
50
(12
), 1145
–1148
(1982
).15.
As mentioned in this article, a mass hanging in equilibrium from a spring will satisfy A graph of displacement versus added-mass then gives a slope of As described in Appendix B, a mass that is hung from a spring and set to oscillating has a characteristic period. A plot of vs then gives a line with slope In principle, divided by will give a calculation of the local gravitational field. In a paper in preparation, these values are compared to the acceleration due to gravity measured by a spark-machine free-fall experiment and the gravitational field measured by a swinging pendulum. The free-fall experiment gave repeatable results consistently lower than expected. The springs and pendula independently gave repeatable results that were higher than expected and consistent with each other. The systematic uncertainties are still being investigated.
16.
Philip R. Bevington and D. Keith Robinson, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1992), 2nd ed., Chaps. 6, 11.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2004
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.