We show the utility of following up collaborative group work with written exercises. In a previous paper we discussed promoting conceptual change using collaborative group exercises in a manner based on the notion of conceptual conflict developed by Hewson and Hewson in which representatives of differing viewpoints debate their outlook. In this paper, we describe an enhancement of this method based on Feyerabend’s principle of counterinduction—the process by which one theory or idea is used to affect change in its rival. Students were required to follow up the conceptual conflict exercises with a written critique. Evaluations were done using the same enhanced version of the force concept inventory as administered to the students in the previous study.

1.
C. S.
Kalman
,
S.
Morris
,
C.
Cottin
, and
R.
Gordon
, “
Promoting conceptual change using collaborative groups in quantitative gateway courses
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
S45
S51
(
1999
).
2.
P.
Hewson
and
M.
Hewson
, “
The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of scientific instruction
,”
Instructional Sci.
13
,
1
13
(
1984
).
3.
P. Abrami, B. Chambers, C. Poulsen, J. Howden, S. d’Apollonia, C. De Simone, K. Kastelorizos, D. Wagner, and A. Glashin, Using Cooperative Learning (Brown Communications, Dubuque, IL, 1993).
4.
R. Berg, The Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demonstrations (The Education Group, Los Angeles, CA, 1992).
5.
R. J.
Sternberg
, “Thinking style keys to understanding students,” Phi Delta Kappan (1), 366–371 (1990).
6.
Craig E. Nelson, “Critical thinking and collaborative learning,” in Collaborative Learning: Underlying Processes and Effective Techniques, edited by Keris Bosworth and Sharon J. Hamilton (Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series, San Francisco, CA, 1964).
7.
P. Feyerabend, Against Method (Verso, New York, 1993), 3rd ed. These quotes also are found in the first edition published in 1975.
8.
For more details on Feyerabend’s analysis, its relationship to conceptual change models and critical thinking, see
C. S.
Kalman
, “
Developing critical thinking in undergraduate courses: A philosophical approach
,”
Sci. & Educ.
11
,
83
94
(
2002
).
9.
G. J.
Posner
,
K. A.
Strike
,
P. W.
Hewson
, and
W. A.
Gertzog
, “
Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
,”
Sci. Educ.
66
,
211
227
(
1982
).
These authors divide the question, how do we produce conceptual change, into two parts: Under what conditions does one central concept come to be replaced by another? What are the features of a conceptual ecology that govern the selection of new concepts?
10.
D.
Hestenes
,
M.
Wells
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
Force concept inventory
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
141
158
(
1992
).
11.
M. A.
Stephens
, “
EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons
,”
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
69
,
730
737
(
1974
).
12.
W. L. Hays, Statistics for the Social Sciences (Holt Rinehart Winston, New York, 1988), 4th ed.
13.
G. W. Snedecor and W. G. Cochran, Statistical Methods (Iowa State U.P., Ames, IA, 1989), 8th ed.
14.
H. Levene, “Robust tests for equality of variance,” in Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, edited by I. Olkin, G. G. Sudhish, H. Wassily, W. G. Madow, and H. B. Mann (Stanford U.P., Palo Alto, CA, 1960), pp. 278–292.
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.