Measurements are presented of the speed at which objects of different mass can be projected by an overarm throw. Light objects can be thrown faster than heavy objects, although the difference in speed is not as large as one might expect. For a factor of 60 increase in the thrown mass, there was a decrease of only 2.4 in the throw speed. The relatively small change in throw speed is due to the fact that the force that can be applied to a thrown object increases with object mass. Estimates of the muscle forces involved indicate that the increase in force with mass is primarily an inertial rather than a physiological effect. The total kinetic energy of the mass, hand, and the forearm was found to be almost independent of the object mass, and the throw speed is almost independent of the mass of the upper arm.

1.
N. P.
Linthorne
, “
Optimum release angle in the shot put
,”
J. Sports Sci.
19
,
359
372
(
2001
).
2.
E. Kreighbaum and K. M. Barthels, Biomechanics (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1996), 4th ed., p. 578.
3.
C. A.
Putnam
, “
Sequential motions of body segments in striking and throwing skills: Descriptions and explanations
,”
J. Biomech.
26
, Suppl 1,
125
135
(
1993
).
4.
R. McN.
Alexander
, “
Optimum timing of muscle activation for simple models of throwing
,”
J. Theor. Biol.
150
,
349
372
(
1991
).
5.
H. J. J.
Joris
,
A. J. Edwards
Van Muyen
,
G. J.
Van Ingen Schenau
, and
H. C.-G.
Kemper
, “
Force, velocity and energy flow during the overarm throw in female handball players
,”
J. Biomech.
18
,
409
414
(
1985
).
6.
D.
Southard
, “
Mass and velocity: Control parameters for throwing patterns
,”
Res. Q. Exerc Sport
69
,
355
367
(
1998
).
7.
H. Brody, R. Cross, and C. Lindsey, The Physics and Technology of Tennis (RacquetTech, Solana Beach, CA, 2002), pp. 163–165. Available from 〈www.racquettech.com〉.
8.
A. M.
Nathan
, “
Characterizing the performance of baseball bats
,”
Am. J. Phys.
71
,
134
143
(
2003
).
9.
R.
Baugh
, “
Dynamics of spear throwing
,”
Am. J. Phys.
71
,
345
350
(
2003
).
10.
We used Kaleidagraph, Synergy Software, 〈www.synergy.com〉.
11.
B. R. MacIntosh and R. J. Holash, “Power output and force-velocity properties of muscle,” in Biomechanics and Biology of Movement (Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 2000), pp. 193–210.
12.
R. F. Schmidt and G. Thews, Human Physiology (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989), 2nd ed., p. 76.
13.
G. Watts and A. T. Bahill, Keep Your Eye on the Ball: The Science and Folklore of Baseball (Freeman, New York, 1990).
14.
R. Bartlett, Sports Biomechanics: Reducing Injury and Improving Performance (E and FN Spon, London, 1999), pp. 109–145.
15.
C. B. Daish, The Physics of Ball Games (English Universities Press, London, 1972).
16.
S. R.
Mitchell
,
R.
Jones
, and
M.
King
, “
Head speed vs. racket inertia in the tennis serve
,”
Sports Eng.
3
,
99
110
(
2000
).
17.
G. S.
Fleisig
,
N.
Zheng
,
D. F.
Stodden
, and
J. R.
Andrews
, “
Relationship between bat mass properties and bat velocity
,”
Sports Eng.
5
,
1
14
(
2000
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.