Faraday’s law (or flux rule) is beautiful in its simplicity, but difficulties are often encountered when applying it to specific situations, particularly those where points making contact to extended conductors move over finite time intervals. These difficulties have led some to challenge the generality of the flux rule. The challenges are usually coupled with the claim that the Lorentz force law is general, even though proofs have been given of the equivalence of the two for calculating instantaneous emfs in well-defined filamentary circuits. I review a rule for applying Faraday’s law, which says that the circuit at any instant must be fixed in a conducting material and must change continuously. The rule still leaves several choices for choosing the circuit. To explicate the rule, it will be applied to several challenges, including one by Feynman.

1.
P. J.
Scanlon
and
R. N.
Henriksen
, “
Comment on ‘One-piece Faraday generator: A paradoxical experiment from 1851’
,”
Am. J. Phys.
47
,
917
918
(
1979
).
2.
J.
Guala-Valverde
,
P.
Mazzoni
, and
R.
Achilles
, “
The homopolar motor: A true relativistic engine
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
1052
1055
(
2002
).
3.
Robert H. Good, Classical Electromagnetism (Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth, TX, 1999), p. 107.
4.
David J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999), p. 298.
5.
Eugene Hecht, Physics: Calculus (Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 2000), 2nd ed., p. 815.
6.
Munir H. Nayfeh and Morton K. Brussel, Electricity and Magnetism (Wiley, New York, 1985), pp. 358, 360.
7.
P. J.
Scanlon
,
R. N.
Henriksen
, and
J. R.
Allen
, “
Approaches to electromagnetic induction
,”
Am. J. Phys.
37
,
698
708
(
1969
).
8.
Melvin Schwartz, Principles of Electrodynamics (Dover, New York, 1972), pp. 187–188.
9.
Roald K. Wangsness, Electromagnetic Fields (Wiley, New York, 1987), 2nd ed., pp. 269–271.
10.
Hans C. Ohanian, Classical Electrodynamicsw (Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 1988), pp. 301–302.
11.
Paul Lorrain, Dale R. Corson, and François Lorrain, Fundamentals of Electromagnetic Phenomena (Freeman and Co., New York, 2000), p. 325.
12.
Leonard B. Loeb, Fundamentals of Electricity and Magnetism (Wiley, New York, 1947), 3rd ed., pp. 282–283.
13.
David L. Webster, “Electricity,” in Encyclopaedia Britannica (Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago, 1968), pp. 174–177.
14.
Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1964), Vol. II, pp. 17-2–17-3.
15.
Nathan
Rosen
, “
Some remarks on Faraday’s law
,”
Am. J. Phys.
50
,
974
975
(
1982
).
16.
M. J.
Crooks
,
D. B.
Litvin
, and
P. W.
Matthews
, “
One-piece Faraday generator: A paradoxical experiment from 1851
,”
Am. J. Phys.
46
,
729
731
(
1978
).
17.
Reference 7, p. 1054.
18.
Michael Faraday, “Experimental researches in electricity,” in Great Books of the Western World, edited by Robert Maynard Hutchins (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Chicago, 1952), Vol. 45, paragraphs 149–156 and 3159.
19.
Jerry B. Marion and William F. Hornyak, Principles of Physics (Sanders College, Philadelphia, 1984), p. 587.
20.
Reference 8, p. 114 (Example 4-4). Good’s example is for a unipolar generator where a cylindrical permanent magnet is spun on its axis, but the argument would clearly apply to the Faraday disk too.
21.
Reference 5, pp. 306–307.
22.
Bill
Layton
and
Martin
Simon
, “
A different twist on the Lorentz force and Faraday’s law
,”
Phys. Teach.
36
,
474
479
(
1998
).
23.
Reference 18, paragraphs 3090–3098.
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.