Both high school and university students’ reasoning regarding direct current resistive electric circuits often differ from the accepted explanations. At present, there are no standard diagnostic tests on electric circuits. Two versions of a diagnostic instrument were developed, each consisting of 29 questions. The information provided by this test can provide instructors with a way of evaluating the progress and conceptual difficulties of their students. The analysis indicates that students, especially females, tend to hold multiple misconceptions, even after instruction. During interviews, the idea that the battery is a constant source of current was used most often in answering the questions. Students tended to focus on the current in solving problems and to confuse terms, often assigning the properties of current to voltage and/or resistance.

1.
D.
Hestenes
,
M.
Wells
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
Force concept inventory
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
(
3
),
141
158
(
1992
).
2.
R. J.
Beichner
, “
Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs
,”
Am. J. Phys.
62
(
8
),
750
762
(
1994
).
3.
P. V. Engelhardt, “Examining students’ understanding of electrical circuits through multiple-choice testing and interviews,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University (1997). The interested reader can read a more in-depth literature review in Chap. 2.
4.
M.
Arnold
and
R.
Millar
, “
Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of introductory ideas in electricity
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
9
(
5
),
553
563
(
1987
);
N.
Fredette
and
J.
Lochhead
, “
Student conceptions of simple circuits
,”
Phys. Teach.
18
(
3
),
194
198
(
1980
);
C. Kärrqvist, “Pupils are able,” in Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, edited by J. Novak (Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York, 1987), pp. 293–296;
L. C. McDermott and E. H. van Zee, “Identifying and addressing student difficulties with electric xircuits,” in Aspects of Understanding Electricity: Proceedings of an International Workshop, Ludwigsburg, Germany, edited by R. Duit, W. Jung, and C. von Rhöneck (Vertrieb Schmidt and Klaunig, Kiel, Germany, 1984), pp. 39–48;
R.
Osborne
, “
Children’s ideas about electric current
,”
New Zealand Sci. Teach.
29
,
12
19
(
1981
);
D. M.
Shipstone
, “
A study of children’s understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits
,”
Eur. J. Sci. Educ.
6
(
2
),
185
198
(
1984
).
5.
P.
Licht
and
G. D.
Thijs
, “
Method to trace coherence and persistence of preconceptions
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
12
(
4
),
403
416
(
1990
);
R.
Cohen
,
B.
Eylon
, and
U.
Ganiel
, “
Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of student’s concepts
,”
Am. J. Phys.
51
(
5
),
407
412
(
1983
);
J. J.
Dupin
and
S.
Johsua
, “
Conceptions of French pupils concerning electric circuits: Structure and evolution
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
24
(
9
),
791
806
(
1987
).
6.
C. von Rhöneck and B. Völker, “Semantic structures describing the electric circuit before and after instruction,” in Aspects of Understanding Electricity: Proceedings of an International Workshop, Ludwigsburg, Germany, edited by R. Duit, W. Jung, and C. von Rhöneck (Vertrieb Schmidt and Klaunig, Kiel, Germany, 1984), pp. 95–106;
W. Jung, “Category questionnaires—The technique and some results,” ibid., pp. 197–204;
P. M.
Heller
and
F. N.
Finley
, “
Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study in current electricity
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
29
(
3
),
259
275
(
1992
).
7.
S.
Johsua
, “
Students’ interpretation of simple electrical diagrams
,”
Eur. J. Sci. Educ.
6
(
3
),
271
275
(
1984
).
8.
M. Caillot, “Problem representations and problem-solving procedures in electricity,” in Aspects of Understanding Electricity, Proceedings of an International Workshop, edited by R. Duit, W. Jung, and C. von Rhöneck (Vertrieb Schmidt and Klaunig, Kiel, Germany, 1984), pp. 139–151;
L. C.
McDermott
and
P. S.
Shaffer
, “
Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
(
11
),
994
1003
(
1992
).
9.
See McDermott and Shaffer, Ref. 7.
10.
R. Gott, “The place of electricity in the assessment of performance in science,” in Aspects of Understanding Electricity, Proceedings of an International Workshop, edited by R. Duit, W. Jung, and C. von Rhöneck (Vertrieb Schmidt & Klaunig, Kiel, Germany, 1984), pp. 49–61.
11.
P. M.
Heller
and
F. N.
Finley
, “
Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study in current electricity
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
29
(
3
),
259
275
(
1992
);
L. C.
McDermott
and
P. S.
Shaffer
, “
Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
(
11
),
994
1003
(
1992
).
12.
J. L. Closset, “Sequential reasoning in electricity,” in Research on Physics Education: Proceedings of the First International Workshop (Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, La Londe les Maures, France, 1984), pp. 313–319;
D. M.
Shipstone
, “
A study of children’s understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits
,”
Eur. J. Sci. Educ.
6
(
2
),
185
198
(
1984
).
13.
C. von Rhöneck and K. Grob, “Representation and problem-solving in basic electricity, predictors for successful learning,” in Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, edited by J. D. Novak (Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York, 1987), p. 564.
14.
J. M. Sebastià, “Cognitive mediators and interpretations of electric circuits,” in Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (Misconceptions Trust, Ithaca, New York, 1993).
15.
R.
Cohen
,
B.
Eylon
, and
U.
Ganiel
, “
Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of student’s concepts
,”
Am. J. Phys.
51
(
5
),
407
412
(
1983
);
R.
Millar
and
K. L.
Beh
, “
Students’ understanding of voltage in simple parallel electric circuits
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
15
(
4
),
351
361
(
1993
);
H. F. van Aalst, “The differentiation between connections in series and in parallel from cognitive mapping; Implications for teaching,” in Aspects of Understanding Electricity, Proceedings of an International Workshop, edited by R. Duit, W. Jung, and C. von Rhöneck (Vertrieb Schmidt & Klaunig, Kiel, Germany, 1984), pp. 115–128.
16.
Ref. 14, van Aalst, p. 124.
17.
Arnold B. Arons, Teaching Introductory Physics (Wiley, New York, 1997), p. 4.
18.
R.
Cohen
,
B.
Eylon
, and
U.
Ganiel
, “
Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of student’s concepts
,”
Am. J. Phys.
51
(
5
),
407
412
(
1983
);
J. J.
Dupin
and
S.
Johsua
, “
Conceptions of French pupils concerning electric circuits: Structure and evolution
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
24
(
9
),
791
806
(
1987
);
K. Grob, V. L. Pollack, and C. von Rhöneck, “Computerized analysis of students’ ability to process information in the area of basic electricity,” in Proceedings of the Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, edited by F. G. Reinders Duit and Hans Niedderer (The Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany, 1991), pp. 296–309;
S. M.
Lea
,
B. A.
Thacker
,
E.
Kim
, and
K. M.
Miller
, “
Computer-assisted assessment of student understanding in physics
,”
Comput. Phys.
8
(
1
),
122
127
(
1994
);
P.
Licht
and
G. D.
Thijs
, “
Method to trace coherence and persistence of preconceptions
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
12
(
4
),
403
416
(
1990
);
R.
Millar
and
T.
King
, “
Students’ understanding of voltage in simple series electric circuits
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
15
(
3
),
339
349
(
1993
);
David R. Sokoloff, “Teaching Electric Circuit Concepts Using Microcomputer-Based Current and Voltage Probes,” Chapter in Microcomputer-Based Labs: Educational Research and Standards, Series F, Computer and Systems Sciences, 156, 129–146, edited by Robert F. Tinker (Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag, 1996);
M. S.
Steinberg
and
C. L.
Wainwright
, “
Using models to teach electricity: The CASTLE project
,”
Phys. Teach.
31
(
9
),
353
357
(
1993
).
19.
A. H.
Johnstone
and
A. R.
Mughol
, “
The concept of electrical resistance
,”
Phys. Educ.
13
,
46
49
(
1978
).
20.
D. M.
Shipstone
,
C.
von Rhöneck
,
W.
Jung
,
C.
Kärrqvist
,
J. J.
Dupin
,
S.
Johsua
, and
P.
Licht
, “
A study of students’ understanding of electricity in five European countries
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
10
(
3
),
303
316
(
1988
).
21.
P. S.
Shaffer
and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II: Design of instructional strategies
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
(
11
),
1003
1013
(
1992
).
22.
L. C.
McDermott
and
P. S.
Shaffer
, “
Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
(
11
),
994
1000
(
1992
).
23.
D.
Psillos
,
P.
Koumaras
, and
O.
Valassiades
, “
Pupils’ representations of electric current before, during and after instruction on DC circuits
,”
Res. Sci. Technol. Educ.
5
(
2
),
193
(
1987
).
24.
L. C. McDermott et al., Physics by Inquiry (Wiley, New York, 1996), Vol. II.
25.
R. A. Serway and J. S. Faughn, College Physics (Saunders College, New York, 1985).
26.
R. Chabay and B. Sherwood, Electric & Magnetic Interactions (Wiley, New York, 1995).
27.
R.
Cohen
,
B.
Eylon
, and
U.
Ganiel
, “
Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of student’s concepts
,”
Am. J. Phys.
51
(
5
),
407
412
(
1983
).
28.
J. W. Best, Research in Education, 4th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981), p. 14.
29.
DIRECT version 1.1 is available from 〈http://www.ncsu.edu/PER〉.
30.
These results and the accompanying tables are available at 〈http://www.ncsu.edu/PER〉. Files containing both versions of the test are also available.
31.
A. B. Arons, A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching (Wiley, New York, 1990), pp. 3–6.
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.