It is shown that no theory that satisfies certain premises can exclude faster-than-light influences. The premises include neither the existence of hidden variables nor counterfactual definiteness, nor any premise that effectively entails the general existence of outcomes of unperformed local measurements. All the premises are compatible with Copenhagen philosophy and the principles and predictions of relativistic quantum field theory. The present proof is contrasted with an earlier one with the same objective.
REFERENCES
1.
J. S.
Bell
, “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
,” Physics
1
, 195
–200
(1964
);J.
Clauser
and A.
Shimony
, “Bell’s theorem: Experimental tests and implications
,” Rep. Prog. Phys.
41
, 1881
–1927
(1978
).2.
J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987), Chap. 4.
3.
H. Stapp, “Nonlocal character of quantum theory,” Epistemological Letters, June 1978, Assoc. F. Gonseth, Case Postal 1081, Bienne, Switzerland.
4.
A.
Fine
, “Hidden variables, joint probabilities and Bell inequalities
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
48
, 291
–295
(1982
).5.
L.
Hardy
, “Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
71
, 1665
–1668
(1993
);P.
Kwiat
, P.
Eberhard
, A.
Steinberg
, and R.
Chiao
, “Proposal for a loophole-free Bell inequality experiment
,” Phys. Rev. A
49
, 3209
–3220
(1994
).6.
S.
Tomonaga
, “On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields
,” Prog. Theor. Phys.
1
, 27
–42
(1946
).7.
J.
Schwinger
, “The theory of quantized fields. I
,” Phys. Rev.
82
, 914
–927
(1951
).8.
To obtain these four predictions from Hardy’s paper, one transforms my notation into Hardy’s, as explained in the Appendix.
9.
H. P.
Stapp
, “Nonlocal character of quantum theory
,” Am. J. Phys.
65
, 300
–304
(1997
).10.
W.
Unruh
, “Nonlocality, counterfactuals, and quantum physics
,” Phys. Rev. A
59
, 126
–130
(1999
).11.
N. D.
Mermin
, “Nonlocal character of quantum theory?
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
, 920
–924
(1998
).12.
A.
Shimony
and H.
Stein
, “Comment on ‘Nonlocal character of quantum theory’ by Henry P. Stapp
,” Am. J. Phys.
69
, 848
–853
(2001
).13.
H. P.
Stapp
, “Reply to Unruh,” quant-ph/9712043.14.
H. P.
Stapp
, “Meaning of counterfactual statements in quantum physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
, 924
–926
(1998
).15.
H. P.
Stapp
, “Response to ‘Comment on Nonlocal character of quantum theory, by Henry P. Stapp’
,” Am. J. Phys.
69
, 854
–859
(1998
).16.
A.
Einstein
, B.
Podolsky
, and N.
Rosen
, “Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?
,” Phys. Rev.
47
, 777
–780
(1935
).17.
N.
Bohr
, “Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?
,” Phys. Rev.
48
, 696
–702
(1935
).18.
A. Rosenfeld, “Commentary of Rosenfeld (1967),” in Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983), p. 142.
19.
N. Bohr, “Discussion with Einstein,” in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, edited by P. A. Schlipp (Tudor, New York, 1951), p. 234.
20.
R. D. Gill, “Time, finite statistics, and Bell’s fifth position,” in Proceedings of Foundations of Probability and Physics 2, Ser. Math. Modelling in Phys., Engin., and Cogn. Sc. 5/2002 (Växjö Univ. Press, Växjö, Sweden, 2003), pp. 179–206 and quant-ph/0301059.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2004
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
