We investigate the effects of interactive computer-based simulations which are presented prior to inquiry-based laboratory experiments on students’ conceptual understanding of mechanics, waves/optics, and thermal physics. In principle, the simulations should serve as a cognitive framework for enhancing the subsequent more open-ended inquiry learning in the subject matter domain of the experiments. To test this prediction, the simulations and experiments were integrated into a one semester class for prospective physics teachers who served as students in the study. Semi-structured interviews were used to assess their ability to make correct predictions about the phenomenon in the experiments before using the latter and give correct explanations of the discrepancies between their predictions and their following observations. Conceptual tests were presented to assess conceptual understandings of each topic. Our results indicate that the use of the simulations improved the students’ ability to make acceptable predictions and explanations of the phenomena in the experiments. The use of simulations also fostered a significant conceptual change in the physics content areas that were studied.
REFERENCES
1.
J.
Halloun
and D.
Hestenes
, “The initial knowledge state of college physics students
,” Am. J. Phys.
53
, 1043
–1055
(1985
);J.
Halloun
and D.
Hestenes
, “Common sense concepts about motion
,” Am. J. Phys.
53
, 1056
–1065
(1985
).2.
L. C.
McDermott
, “Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics
,” Phys. Today
37
(7
), 24
–32
(1984
).3.
L. C.
McDermott
, M.
Rosenquist
, and E.
van Zee
, “Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
, 503
–513
(1987
).4.
M.
Rosenquist
and L. C.
McDermott
, “A conceptual approach to teaching kinematics
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
, 407
–415
(1987
).5.
R.
Gunstone
, “Student understanding in mechanics: A large population survey
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
, 691
–696
(1987
).6.
J.
Bowden
, G.
Dall’alba
, E.
Martin
, D.
Laurillard
, F.
Marton
, G.
Masters
, P.
Ramsden
, A.
Stephanou
, and E.
Walsh
, “Displacement, velocity, and frames of reference: Phenomenographic studies of students’ understanding and some implications for teaching and assessment
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
, 262
–269
(1992
).7.
R.
Driver
, J.
Leach
, P.
Scott
, and C.
Wood-Robinson
, “Young peoples’ understanding of science concepts: implications of cross-age studies for curriculum planning,” Stud. Sci. Ed. 24, 75–100 (1994).8.
D. I.
Dykstra
, F.
Boyle
, and A.
Monarch
, “Studying conceptual change in learning physics
,” Phys. Educ.
76
(6
), 615
–652
(1992
).9.
G.
Posner
, K.
Strike
, P.
Hewson
, and W.
Gertzog
, “Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
,” Sci. Educ.
66
, 211
–227
(1982
).10.
R.
Duschl
and D.
Gitomer
, “Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change: implications for educational practice
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
28
, 839
–858
(1991
).11.
W. M.
Roth
and K.
Lucas
, “From ‘Truth’ to ‘Invented Reality’: A discourse analysis of high school physics students’ talk about scientific knowledge
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
34
, 145
–179
(1997
).12.
C. S.
Kalman
, S.
Morris
, C.
Cottin
, and R.
Gordon
, “Promoting conceptual change using collaborative groups in quantitative gateway courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
(7
), 45
–51
(1999
).13.
J. Piaget, The Equilibration of Cognitive Structure (University of Chicago, Chicago, 1985).
14.
P.
Tao
and R.
Gunstone
, “The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
36
, 859
–882
(1999
).15.
In addition to Ref. 14, see
J.
Bliss
and J.
Ogborn
, “Tools for exploratory learning,” J. Comp. Assist. Learn. 5, 37–50 (1989);S. Papert, Mindstorms (Basic Books, New York, 1980).
16.
In addition to Ref. 14, see
P.
Gorsky
and M.
Finegold
, “Using computer simulations to restructure students’ conception of force,” J. Comp. Math. Sci. Teach. 11, 163–178 (1992).17.
D. J.
Grayson
and L. C.
McDermott
, “Use of the computer for research on student thinking in physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
64
, 557
–565
(1996
).18.
P. W.
Hewson
, “Diagnosis and remediation of an alternate conception of velocity using a microcomputer program
,” Am. J. Phys.
53
, 684
–690
(1985
).19.
M.
Lea
, B. A.
Thacker
, E.
Kim
, and K. M.
Miller
, “Computer assisted assessment of student understanding in physics
,” Comput. Phys.
10
(1
), 30
–37
(1996
).20.
C. Chou, “The effectiveness of using multimedia computer simulations coupled with social constructivist pedagogy in a college introductory physics classroom,” Ph.D. dissertation, Teachers College-Columbia University, New York, 1998.
21.
F.
Goldberg
, “Constructing physics understanding in a computer-supported learning environment
,” AIP Conf. Proc.
399
, 903
–911
(1997
).22.
B. S.
Eylon
, M.
Ronen
, and U.
Ganiel
, “Computer simulations as tools for teaching and learning: Using a simulation environment in optics,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 5 (2), 93–110 (1996).23.
D. J.
Grayson
, “Using education research to develop waves courseware
,” Comput. Phys.
10
(1
), 30
–37
(1996
).24.
A.
Van Heuvelen
, “Using interactive simulations to enhance conceptual development and problem solving skills
,” AIP Conf. Proc.
399
, 1119
–1135
(1997
).25.
R.
Beichner
, L.
Bernold
, E.
Burniston
, P.
Dail
, R.
Felder
, J.
Gastineau
, M.
Gjersten
, and J.
Risley
, “Case study of the physics component of an integrated curriculum
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
, 16
–24
(1999
).26.
E. Steinberg, Teaching Computers to Teach (L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991).
27.
E. Criswell, The Design of Computer-Based Instruction (Macmillan, New York, 1989);
E. Vockell and R. Rivers, Instructional Computing for Today’s Teachers (Macmillan, New York, 1984).
28.
A. Bork, Learning with Computers (Digital, New York, 1982).
29.
R. N.
Steinberg
, “Computers in teaching science: To simulate or not to simulate?
” Am. J. Phys.
68
(7
), S37
–S41
(2000
).30.
See, for example, Interactive Physics (Knowledge Revolution, San Mateo, CA);
E. F. Redish, J. M. Wilson, and I. D. Johnston, The M.U.P.P.E.T. Utilities, THERMO (Physics Academic Software, American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD).
B. White and P. Horwitz, “Computer microworlds and conceptual change: a new approach to science education,” in Improving Learning: New Perspectives, edited by P. Ramsden (Kogan Page, London, 1988), pp. 69–80;
A. I.
Zietsman
and P. W.
Hewson
, “Effect of instruction using microcomputer simulations and conceptual change strategies on science learning
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
23
(1
), 27
–39
(1986
).32.
See, in addition to Ref. 29,
K.
Cummings
, J.
Marx
, R.
Thornton
, and D.
Kuhl
, “Evaluating innovation in studio physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
(7
), S38
–S44
(1999
).33.
D. D.
Long
, G. W.
McLaughlin
, and A. M.
Bloom
, “The influence of physics laboratories on student performance in a lecture course
,” Am. J. Phys.
54
, 122
(1986
);A. B.
Arons
, “Guiding insight and inquiry in the introductory physics laboratory
,” Phys. Teach.
31
, 278
–282
(1993
).34.
The accuracy of these two reasoning skills was assessed by using textbook information as the criterion.
35.
For an example of a simulation that fulfills these criteria, see Ref. 17, p. 561. A similar simulation was used in this study.
36.
L. C. McDermott, Physics by Inquiry (Wiley, New York, 1996), Vol. I, pp. 163–202;
Vol. II, pp. 539–619 and pp. 639–665.
37.
L. C. McDermott, Peter S. Shaffer, and the Physics Education Group at the University of Washington, Tutorials in Introductory Physics (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002).
38.
See, for example,
L. C.
McDermott
, “A perspective on teacher preparation in physics and other sciences: The need for special science courses for teachers
,” Am. J. Phys.
58
, 734
–742
(1992
);E. F.
Redish
and R. N.
Steinberg
, “Teaching physics: Figuring out what works
,” Phys. Today
52
(1
), 24
–30
(1999
);B.
Thacker
, E.
Kim
, K.
Trefz
, and S. M.
Lea
, “Comparing problem solving performance of physics students in inquiry-based and traditional introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
62
, 627
–633
(1994
).39.
E. F.
Redish
, “Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
62
, 796
–803
(1994
).40.
P. G. Hewitt, Conceptual Physics (Little, Brown, Boston, 1985).
41.
Researchers have shown that even a single inquiry-based activity can produce improved conceptual understanding. See, for example,
D. S.
Abbott
, J. M.
Saul
, G. W.
Parker
, and R. J.
Beichner
, “Can one lab make a difference?
” Am. J. Phys.
68
(7
), S60
–S61
(2000
).42.
P. Shaffer, “Research as a guide for improving instruction in introductory physics,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, 1993;
L. G.
Enderstein
and P. E.
Spargo
, “Beliefs regarding force and motion: a longitudinal and cross-cultural study of South African school pupils,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. 18 (4), 479–492 (1996).43.
The pre- and post-tests were available only at specific times, for a short but reasonable duration and on particular days. The students were always informed in advance where and when a pre-test or a post-test was going to be posted. They were asked to respond to all the questions on a test and entered their answers in the text box that was provided on the Web. They were not allowed to print out or save the tests (the students were informed that the website was designed to keep track of any user that prints or saves a test). However, if figures were included in a test, they were offered in Microsoft Word format, so that students would be able to edit both text and simple graphics.
44.
D. Halliday, R. Resnick, and J. Walker, Fundamentals of Physics (Wiley, New York, 1997).
45.
This criterion was derived from Tao’s and Gunstone’s work. See Ref. 14.
46.
D.
Hammer
, “Epistemological considerations in teaching introductory physics
,” Sci. Educ.
79
, 393
–413
(1995
).47.
G. DeBoer, A History of Ideas in Science Education (Teachers College, New York, 1991).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2003 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2003
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
