Physicists are often apologetic about the difference between the physical and colloquial meanings of the term “work,” particularly in situations in which a lot of effort is involved but nothing is moved so no work is done in the physical sense. I argue that there is no need to be apologetic. Many words in mechanics have different physical and colloquial meanings. In the sense that work applies to output rather than input, its physical meaning is closer to the colloquial meaning than many other terms in mechanics. A review of the history shows that force×distance was used to refer to the output of engines since the early eighteenth century. During the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, several terms were used to denote force×distance, but none became widespread and work quickly became the preferred term after it was suggested by G. Coriolis in 1829.

1.
Raymond A. Serway, Principles of Physics (Saunders, Fort Worth, 1998), 2nd ed., p. 143.
2.
Edwin H. Hall and Joseph Y. Bergen, A Text-Book of Physics (Henry Holt, New York, 1897), p. 322.
3.
Robert C.
Hilborn
, “
Let’s ban work from physics!
,”
Phys. Teach.
38
,
447
(
2000
).
4.
Oxford English Dictionary, edited by J. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner (Clarendon, Oxford, 1989), 2nd ed.
5.
David E.
Trowbridge
and
Lillian C.
McDermott
, “
Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension
,”
Am. J. Phys.
49
(
3
),
242
253
(
1981
).
6.
Alan
Van Heuvelen
, Millikan Lecture 1999: “
The workplace, student minds, and physics learning systems
,”
Am. J. Phys.
69
(
11
),
1139
1146
(
2001
).
7.
I.
Grattan-Guinness
, “
Work for the workers: Advances in engineering mechanics and instruction in France, 1800–1830
,”
Ann. Sci.
41
,
1
33
(
1984
).
8.
Thomas S. Kuhn, “Energy conservation as an example of simultaneous discovery,” in Critical Problems in the History of Science, edited by Marshall Clagett (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1959), p. 333.
9.
H. W. Dickinson, A Short History of the Steam Engine (Frank Cass, London, 1963), Chap. III.
10.
G. N. von Tunzelmann, Steam Power and British Industrialization to 1860 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1978), p. 18.
11.
Davies
Gilbert
, “
On the expediency of assigning specific names to all such functions of simple elements as represent definite physical properties; with the suggestion of a new term in mechanics; illustrated by an investigation of the machine moved by recoil, and also by some observations on the steam engine
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London
117
,
25
38
(
1827
).
12.
G. G. de Coriolis, Du Calcul de l’Effet des Machines, ou Considérations sur l’Emploi des Moteurs et sur leur Évaluation, pour Servir d’Introduction a l’Étude Spécial des Machines (Carilian-Goeury, Paris, 1829), p. 17.
13.
Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Charles Coulston Gillespie, editor in chief (Scribner’s, New York, 1971), Vol. III, pp. 416–419.
14.
Reference 8, p. 349, footnote 47.
15.
My translation of the French quotation in Ref. 12.
16.
Karl
Mamola
, “
Confusion
,”
Phys. Teach.
39
,
136
(
2001
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.