The inverse square force law admits a conserved vector that lies in the plane of motion. This vector has been associated with the names of Laplace, Runge, and Lenz, among others. Many workers have explored aspects of the symmetry and degeneracy associated with this vector and with analogous dynamical symmetries. We define a conserved dynamical variable α that characterizes the orientation of the orbit in two-dimensional configuration space for the Kepler problem and an analogous variable β for the isotropic harmonic oscillator. This orbit orientation variable is canonically conjugate to the angular momentum component normal to the plane of motion. We explore the canonical one-parameter group of transformations generated by α(β). Because we have an obvious pair of conserved canonically conjugate variables, it is desirable to use them as a coordinate-momentum pair. In terms of these phase space coordinates, the form of the Hamiltonian is nearly trivial because neither member of the pair can occur explicitly in the Hamiltonian. From these considerations we gain a simple picture of dynamics in phase space. The procedure we use is in the spirit of the Hamilton–Jacobi method.

1.
H.
Goldstein
, “
Prehistory of the ‘Runge–Lenz’ vector
,”
Am. J. Phys.
43
,
737
738
(
1975
);
H.
Goldstein
, “
More prehistory of the Laplace or Runge-Lenz vector
,”
Am. J. Phys.
44
,
1123
1124
(
1976
). The references in these two papers, while not exhaustive, point to some very good early work.
2.
L.
Basano
and
A.
Bianchi
, “
Rutherford’s scattering formula via the Runge-Lenz vector
,”
Am. J. Phys.
48
,
400
401
(
1980
).
3.
R. P.
Patera
, “
Momentum-space derivation of Runge-Lenz vector
,”
Am. J. Phys.
49
,
593
594
(
1981
).
4.
H.
Kaplan
, “
The Runge–Lenz vector as an ‘extra’ constant of motion
,”
Am. J. Phys.
54
,
157
161
(
1986
).
5.
A. C.
Chen
, “
Coulomb–Kepler problem and the harmonic oscillator
,”
Am. J. Phys.
55
,
250
252
(
1987
).
6.
X. L.
Yang
,
M.
Lieber
, and
F. T.
Chan
, “
The Runge–Lenz vector for the two-dimensional hydrogen atom
,”
Am. J. Phys.
59
,
231
232
(
1991
).
7.
C. E.
Aguiar
and
M. F.
Barroso
, “
The Runge–Lenz vector and the perturbed Rutherford scattering
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
,
1042
1048
(
1996
).
8.
D. R.
Brill
and
D.
Goel
, “
Light bending and perihelion precession: A unified approach
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
316
319
(
1999
).
9.
H.
Bacry
,
H.
Ruegg
, and
J.-M.
Souriau
, “
Dynamical groups and spherical potentials in classical mechanics
,”
Commun. Math. Phys.
3
,
323
333
(
1966
).
10.
H. V. McIntosh, “Symmetry and degeneracy,” in Group Theory and Its Applications, edited by E. M. Loebl (Academic, New York, 1971), Vol. II, pp. 75–144.
11.
N.
Mukunda
, “
Realizations of Lie algebras in classical mechanics
,”
J. Math. Phys.
8
,
1069
1072
(
1967
); the present paper is closest in spirit to this reference.
12.
E. C. G. Sudarshan and N. Mukunda, Classical Dynamics: A Modern Perspective (Wiley, New York, 1974), pp. 30–77.
13.
J. V. José and E. J. Salaten, Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), pp. 248–274.
14.
Animated plots can be seen at 〈http://www.amherst.edu/physics/DynamicalSymmetries/〉 (these plots were generated by using standard packages, for example, Mathematica).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.