Vectors and quaternions are quite different mathematical quantities because they have different symmetry properties. Gibbs and Heaviside created their vector system starting from the quaternion system invented by Hamilton. They identified a pure quaternion as a vector and introduced some changes in the product of two vectors defined by Hamilton without realizing that the scalar product and vector product cannot be interpreted as the scalar part and vector part of the quaternion product. Toward the end of the 19th century some authors realized that there was an incompatibility between the vector and quaternion formalisms, but the central problem was not altogether clear. This paper will show that the main difficulty arose from Hamilton’s contradictory use of i, j, and k both as versors and as vectors.
Topics
Vector calculus
REFERENCES
1.
E. T. Whittaker, A History of Theories of Aether and Alectricity (Humanities Press, New York, 1973), Vol. 1.
2.
James Clerk Maxwell, Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (Dover, New York, 1954).
3.
Reginald J.
Stephenson
, “Development of vector analysis from quaternions
,” Am. J. Phys.
34
, 194
–201
(1966
).4.
Alfred M.
Bork
, “Vector versus quaternions—The letters in Nature
,” Am. J. Phys.
34
, 202
–211
(1966
).5.
P. Kelland and P. G. Tait, Introduction to Quaternions with Numerous Examples (MacMillan and Co., London, 1873);
H. T.
Flint
, “Applications of quaternions to the theory of relativity
,” Philos. Mag.
39
, 439
–449
(1920
);L.
Silberstein
, “Quaternionic form of relativity
,” Philos. Mag.
23
, 790
–809
(1912
).6.
David
Hestenes
, “Vectors, spinors, and the complex numbers in classical and quantum physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
39
, 1013
–1027
(1971
).7.
David Hestenes, New Foundations for Classical Mechanics (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999).
8.
Jack B. Kuipers, Quaternions and Rotation Sequences, a Primer with Applications to Orbits, Aerospace, and Virtual Reality (Princeton U.P., Princeton, 1999), p. 105.
9.
Reference 8, p. 114.
10.
Simon L. Altmann, Rotations, Quaternions, and Double Groups (Clarendon, Oxford, 1986), p. 9.
11.
Reference 10, p. 63.
12.
Reference 10, p. 205.
13.
William R. Hamilton, Elements of Quaternions (Chelsea, New York, 1969).
14.
Michael J. Crowe, A History of Vector Analysis: The Evolution of the Idea of a Vectorial System (University of Notre Dame Press, London, 1967), p. 5.
15.
B. L.
Van der Waerden
, “Hamilton’s discovery of quaternions
,” Math. Mag.
49
(5
), 227
–234
(1976
);John
O’Neill
, “Formalism, Hamilton and complex numbers
,” Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci.
17
, 351
–372
(1986
).17.
Altmann argues that the identification of unit quaternions with rotations by π/2 is unacceptable in the study of the rotation group. See Ref. 10, p. 16.
18.
Peter G. Tait, An Elementary Treatise on Quaternions (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1873), 2nd ed., pp. 34–40.
19.
The phrases “polar vector” and “axial vector” were introduced in Woldemar Voigt, Kompendium der theoretischen Physik (Leipzig, 1896), Vol. II, p. 418.
21.
Reference 18, p. 37 (his emphasis).
22.
Reference 18, p. 40.
23.
James. C. Maxwell, Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (Dover, New York, 1954), Vol. I, p. 9.
24.
Lynde P. Wheeler, Josiah Willard Gibbs, The History of a Great Mind (Ox Bow, Woodbridge, 1979), pp. 107–109; Paul J. Nahin, Oliver Heaviside: Sage in Solitude (IEEE Press, New York, 1988), p. 22.
25.
Josiah W. Gibbs, The Scientific Papers of J. Willard Gibbs (Dover, New York, 1961), p. 20.
26.
Reference 25, p. 21.
27.
As a matter of fact, Heaviside used bold letters to represent vector, but we will use italic letters to be consistent with the remainder of the text of our paper.
28.
Oliver Heaviside, Electromagnetic Theory (Chelsea, New York, 1971), Vol. I, p. 271 (his emphasis).
29.
Reference 28, p. 271.
30.
Oliver Heaviside, Electrical Papers (Chelsea, New York, 1970), Vol. II, p. 3.
31.
Reference 28, p. 303.
32.
Reference 14, pp. 182–224.
33.
Alexander
MacFarlane
, “Vectors and quaternions
,” Nature (London)
48
, 540
–541
(1893
).34.
Woldemar Voigt, Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik (Druck und Verlag, Leipzig, 1910), p. 130.
35.
Paul Langevin, “Notions Géométriques Fondamentales,” Encyclopédie des Sciences Mathematiques, Vol. V, 1912, p. 3.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2002
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
