The main purposes of this paper are (i) to illustrate explicitly by a number of examples the gauge functions χ(x,t) whose spatial and temporal derivatives transform one set of electromagnetic potentials into another equivalent set; and (ii) to show that, whatever propagation or nonpropagation characteristics are exhibited by the potentials in a particular gauge, the electric and magnetic fields are always the same and display the experimentally verified properties of causality and propagation at the speed of light. The example of the transformation from the Lorenz gauge (retarded solutions for both scalar and vector potential) to the Coulomb gauge (instantaneous, action-at-a-distance, scalar potential) is treated in detail. A transparent expression is obtained for the vector potential in the Coulomb gauge, with a finite nonlocality in time replacing the expected spatial nonlocality of the transverse current. A class of gauges (v-gauge) is described in which the scalar potential propagates at an arbitrary speed ν relative to the speed of light. The Lorenz and Coulomb gauges are special cases of the v-gauge. The last examples of gauges and explicit gauge transformation functions are the Hamiltonian or temporal gauge, the nonrelativistic Poincaré or multipolar gauge, and the relativistic Fock–Schwinger gauge.

Topics
Fundamental constants, Metric geometry, Coulomb gauge, Gauge fixing
1.
J. D.
Jackson
and
L. B.
Okun
, “
Historical roots of gauge invariance
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
73
,
663
–
680
(
2001
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
2.
J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1999), 3rd ed.
3.
D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999), 3rd ed.
4.
W. K. H. Panofsky and M. Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1962), 2nd ed.
5.
Lorenz is not a typographical error. See Ref. 1, p. 670 for the explanation.
6.
O. L.
Brill
and
B.
Goodman
, “
Causality in the Coulomb gauge
,”
Am. J. Phys.
35
,
832
–
837
(
1967
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
F.
Rohrlich
, “
Causality, the Coulomb field, and Newton’s law of gravitation
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
411
–
414
(
2002
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
See, for example, Ref. 2, Sec. 6.2 (Sec. 6.4 in the second edition).
9.
See Ref. 2, Sec. 6.3 (Sec. 6.5 in the second edition).
10.
Reference 2, p. 129, Eq. (4.20).
11.
Reference 2, pp. 246–247.
12.
See Ref. 1, Sec. II B, for a discussion of Helmholtz’s work and the relevant references.
13.
C. G.
Darwin
, “
The dynamical motions of charged particles
,”
Philos. Mag. Ser. 6
39
,
537
–
551
(
1920
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
14.
O.
Heaviside
, “
On the electromagnetic effects due to the motion of electrification through a dielectric
,”
Philos. Mag. Ser. 5
27
,
324
–
339
(
1889
). See also Ref. 1, Sec. II D.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
K.-H.
Yang
, “
Gauge transformations and quantum mechanics. II. Physical interpretation of classical gauge transformations
,”
Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)
101
,
97
–
118
(
1976
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
16.
G. J. N.
Brown
and
D. S. F.
Crothers
, “
Generalised gauge invariance of electromagnetism
,”
J. Phys. A
22
,
2939
–
2959
(
1989
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
17.
D. M.
Drury
, “
The unification of the Lorentz and Coulomb gauges of electromagnetic theory
,”
IEEE Trans. Educ.
43
(
1
),
69
–
72
(
2000
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
18.
C.
Baxter
, “
α-Lorentz gauge QED
,”
Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)
206
,
221
–
236
(
1991
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
19.
Yang, (Ref. 15), who uses the gauge invariance of the fields in his derivation, has expression (3.22) for his v-gauge vector potential that is the equivalent of adding the gradient of (7.5) to the Lorenz-gauge A.
20.
Combine Brown and Crothers’ equations (41), (44), (46), (48), into (49). Their summary equations [(50) and (51)] suffer from some typographical errors and ambiguity.
21.
E. A.
Power
and
S.
Zienau
, “
Coulomb gauge in non-relativistic quantum electrodynamics and the shape of spectral lines
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
251
,
427
–
454
(
1959
).
Google Scholar
 
22.
R. G.
Woolley
, “
Molecular quantum electrodynamics
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
321
,
557
–
572
(
1971
);
Google Scholar
 
R. G.
Woolley
, “
The electrodynamics of atoms and molecules
,”
Adv. Chem. Phys.
33
,
153
–
233
(
1975
).
Google Scholar
 
23.
V. A.
Fock
, “
Die Eigenzeit in der klassischen und in der Quantenmechanik
,”
Phys. Z. Sowjetunion
12
,
404
–
425
(
1937
).
Google Scholar
 
24.
J.
Schwinger
, “
On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization
,”
Phys. Rev.
82
,
664
–
679
(
1951
);
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
J. Schwinger, Particles, Sources, and Fields, 3 vols. (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1970–1973), Vol. I, p. 271.
25.
D. H.
Kobe
, “
Gauge transformations and the electric dipole approximation
,”
Am. J. Phys.
50
,
128
–
133
(
1982
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
26.
W. E.
Brittin
,
W. R.
Smythe
, and
W.
Wyss
, “
Poincaré gauge in electrodynamics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
50
,
693
–
696
(
1982
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
27.
B.-S. K.
Skagerstam
, “
A note on the Poincaré gauge
,”
Am. J. Phys.
51
,
1148
–
1149
(
1983
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
28.
See Kobe (Ref. 25), Appendices C and D, if you need help.
29.
A. M.
Stewart
, “
Gauge transformation between retarded and multipolar gauges
,”
Pramana, J. Phys.
56
,
685
–
689
(
2001
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
30.
M.
Göppert-Mayer
, “
Über Elementarakte mit zwei Quantensprüngen
,”
Ann. Phys. (Leipzig)
9
,
273
–
294
(
1931
).
Google Scholar
 
31.
P. W.
Atkins
and
R. G.
Woolley
, “
The interaction of molecular multipoles with the electromagnetic field in the canonical formulation of non-covariant quantum electrodynamics
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
319
,
549
–
563
(
1970
).
Google Scholar
 
32.
R. Loudon, Quantum Theory of Light (Oxford U.P., New York, 2000), 3rd ed., pp. 155–162.
33.
Two papers that discuss different forms of QED by means of gauge transformations are
M.
Babiker
and
R.
Loudon
, “
Derivation of the Power–Zienau–Woolley Hamiltonian in quantum electrodynamics by gauge transformation
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
385
,
439
–
460
(
1983
);
Google Scholar
 
V.
Chernyak
and
S.
Mukamel
, “
Gauge invariant formulation of molecular electrodynamics and the multipolar Hamiltonian
,”
Chem. Phys.
198
,
133
–
143
(
1995
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
34.
I believe there is an error in sign in Skagerstam (Ref. 27), at least if I understand his words correctly. He too leaves the verification to the reader.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2002
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.