The relation between traditional physics textbook problem solving and conceptual understanding was investigated. The number of problems a student solved, as estimated by students themselves, ranged from 300 to 2900 with an average of about 1500. The students did not have much difficulty in using physics formulas and mathematics. However, we found that they still had many of the well-known conceptual difficulties with basic mechanics, and there was little correlation between the number of problems solved and conceptual understanding. This result suggests that traditional problem solving has a limited effect on conceptual understanding.

1.
A. B.
Champagne
,
L. E.
Klopfer
, and
J. H.
Anderson
, “
Facts influencing the learning of classical mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
48
,
1074
1079
(
1980
).
2.
J.
Clement
, “
Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
50
,
66
71
(
1982
).
3.
R. F.
Gunstone
, “
Student understanding in mechanics: A large population survey
,”
Am. J. Phys.
55
,
691
696
(
1987
).
4.
L. C.
McDermott
,
P. S.
Shaffer
, and
M. D.
Somers
, “
Research as a guide for teaching introductory mechanics: An illustration in the context of the Atwood’s machine
,”
Am. J. Phys.
62
,
46
55
(
1994
).
5.
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics
,”
Phys. Today
37
(
7
),
24
32
(
1984
).
6.
D.
Twigger
et al., “
The conception of force and motion of students aged between 10 and 15 years: An interview study designed to guide instruction
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
16
,
215
229
(
1994
).
7.
D. Halliday, R. Resnick, and J. Walker, Fundamentals of Physics (Wiley, New York, 1994), 4th ed.
8.
I. A.
Halloun
and
D.
Hestenes
, “
The initial knowledge state of college physics students
,”
Am. J. Phys.
53
,
1043
1055
(
1985
);
D. Hestenes (private communication).
9.
D.
Hestenes
,
M.
Wells
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
Force concept inventory
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
131
158
(
1992
).
10.
D.
Hestenes
and
M.
Wells
, “
Mechanics baseline test
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
159
166
(
1992
).
11.
L. C. McDermott et al., Tutorials in Physics (Physics Education Group, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 1991–1992).
12.
F. W. Sears, M. W. Zemansky, and H. D. Young, University Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1984), 6th ed.
13.
D. E.
Trowbridge
and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension
,”
Am. J. Phys.
49
,
242
253
(
1981
).
14.
R. W.
Whitaker
, “
Aristotle is not dead: Student understanding of trajectory motion
,”
Am. J. Phys.
51
,
352
357
(
1983
).
15.
I. A.
Halloun
and
D.
Hestenes
, “
Common sense concepts about motion
,”
Am. J. Phys.
53
,
1056
1065
(
1985
).
16.
R.
Trumper
, “
A cross-college age study about physics students’ conceptions of force in pre-service training for high school teachers
,”
Phys. Educ.
31
,
227
236
(
1996
).
17.
D. E.
Brown
, “
Students’ concept of force: the importance of understanding Newton’s third law
,”
Phys. Educ.
24
,
353
357
(
1989
).
18.
P.
Whiteley
, “
Using free body diagrams as a diagnostic instrument
,”
Phys. Educ.
31
,
309
313
(
1996
).
19.
P.
Labudde
,
F.
Reif
, and
L.
Quinn
, “
Facilitation of scientific concept learning by interpretation procedures and diagnosis
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
10
,
81
98
(
1988
).
20.
R. A.
Lawson
and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Student understanding of work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems
,”
Am. J. Phys.
55
,
811
817
(
1987
).
21.
F.
Reif
and
S.
Allen
, “
Cognition for interpreting scientific concepts: A study of acceleration
,”
Cogn. Instruct.
9
(
1
),
1
44
(
1992
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.