The relation between traditional physics textbook problem solving and conceptual understanding was investigated. The number of problems a student solved, as estimated by students themselves, ranged from 300 to 2900 with an average of about 1500. The students did not have much difficulty in using physics formulas and mathematics. However, we found that they still had many of the well-known conceptual difficulties with basic mechanics, and there was little correlation between the number of problems solved and conceptual understanding. This result suggests that traditional problem solving has a limited effect on conceptual understanding.
Topics
Education
REFERENCES
1.
A. B.
Champagne
, L. E.
Klopfer
, and J. H.
Anderson
, “Facts influencing the learning of classical mechanics
,” Am. J. Phys.
48
, 1074
–1079
(1980
).2.
J.
Clement
, “Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics
,” Am. J. Phys.
50
, 66
–71
(1982
).3.
R. F.
Gunstone
, “Student understanding in mechanics: A large population survey
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
, 691
–696
(1987
).4.
L. C.
McDermott
, P. S.
Shaffer
, and M. D.
Somers
, “Research as a guide for teaching introductory mechanics: An illustration in the context of the Atwood’s machine
,” Am. J. Phys.
62
, 46
–55
(1994
).5.
L. C.
McDermott
, “Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics
,” Phys. Today
37
(7
), 24
–32
(1984
).6.
D.
Twigger
et al., “The conception of force and motion of students aged between 10 and 15 years: An interview study designed to guide instruction
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
16
, 215
–229
(1994
).7.
D. Halliday, R. Resnick, and J. Walker, Fundamentals of Physics (Wiley, New York, 1994), 4th ed.
8.
I. A.
Halloun
and D.
Hestenes
, “The initial knowledge state of college physics students
,” Am. J. Phys.
53
, 1043
–1055
(1985
);D. Hestenes (private communication).
9.
D.
Hestenes
, M.
Wells
, and G.
Swackhamer
, “Force concept inventory
,” Phys. Teach.
30
, 131
–158
(1992
).10.
D.
Hestenes
and M.
Wells
, “Mechanics baseline test
,” Phys. Teach.
30
, 159
–166
(1992
).11.
L. C. McDermott et al., Tutorials in Physics (Physics Education Group, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 1991–1992).
12.
F. W. Sears, M. W. Zemansky, and H. D. Young, University Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1984), 6th ed.
13.
D. E.
Trowbridge
and L. C.
McDermott
, “Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension
,” Am. J. Phys.
49
, 242
–253
(1981
).14.
R. W.
Whitaker
, “Aristotle is not dead: Student understanding of trajectory motion
,” Am. J. Phys.
51
, 352
–357
(1983
).15.
I. A.
Halloun
and D.
Hestenes
, “Common sense concepts about motion
,” Am. J. Phys.
53
, 1056
–1065
(1985
).16.
R.
Trumper
, “A cross-college age study about physics students’ conceptions of force in pre-service training for high school teachers
,” Phys. Educ.
31
, 227
–236
(1996
).17.
D. E.
Brown
, “Students’ concept of force: the importance of understanding Newton’s third law
,” Phys. Educ.
24
, 353
–357
(1989
).18.
P.
Whiteley
, “Using free body diagrams as a diagnostic instrument
,” Phys. Educ.
31
, 309
–313
(1996
).19.
P.
Labudde
, F.
Reif
, and L.
Quinn
, “Facilitation of scientific concept learning by interpretation procedures and diagnosis
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
10
, 81
–98
(1988
).20.
R. A.
Lawson
and L. C.
McDermott
, “Student understanding of work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
, 811
–817
(1987
).21.
F.
Reif
and S.
Allen
, “Cognition for interpreting scientific concepts: A study of acceleration
,” Cogn. Instruct.
9
(1
), 1
–44
(1992
).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2002
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
