We analyze the problem-solving strategies of physics professors in a case where their physical intuition fails. A nonintuitive introductory-level problem was identified and posed to twenty physics professors. The problem placed the professors in a situation often encountered by students, and their response highlights the importance of intuition and experience in problem solving. Although professors had difficulty in solving the problem under the time constraint, they initially employed a systematic approach, for example, visualizing the problem, considering various conservation laws, and examining limiting cases. After finding that familiar techniques were not fruitful, they made incorrect predictions based on one of two equally important factors. In contrast, other more familiar problems that require the consideration of two important principles (for example, conservation of both energy and momentum for a ballistic pendulum) were quickly solved by the same professors. The responses of students who were given the same problem reflected no overarching strategies or systematic approaches, and a much wider variety of incorrect responses were given. This investigation highlights the importance of teaching effective problem-solving heuristics, and suggests that instructors assess the difficulty of a problem from the perspective of beginning students.

1.
F.
Reif
, “
Scientific approaches to science education
,”
Phys. Today
39
(
11
),
48
54
(
1986
);
F.
Reif
, “
Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes
,”
Am. J. Phys.
63
,
17
32
(
1995
);
F.
Reif
, “
Teaching problem solving: A scientific approach
,”
Phys. Teach.
19
,
310
316
(
1981
).
2.
J.
Larkin
,
J.
McDermott
,
D.
Simon
, and
H.
Simon
, “
Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems
,”
Science
208
,
1335
1362
(
1980
);
J.
Larkin
, “
Cognition of learning physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
49
(
6
),
534
541
(
1981
).
3.
W. J.
Leonard
,
R. J.
Dufresne
, and
J. P.
Mestre
, “
Using qualitative problem-solving strategies to highlight the role of conceptual knowledge in solving problems
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
,
1495
1503
(
1996
);
J. P.
Mestre
,
R.
Dufresne
,
W. J.
Gerace
,
P. T.
Hardiman
, and
J. S.
Touger
, “
Promoting skilled problem solving behavior among beginning physics students
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
30
,
303
317
(
1993
).
4.
M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, and E. Rees, “Expertise in problem solving,” in Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, edited by R. J. Sternberg (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1982), Vol. 1, pp. 7–75;
M. T. H.
Chi
,
P. J.
Feltovich
, and
R.
Glaser
, “
Categorization and representation of physics knowledge by experts and novices
,”
Cogn. Sci.
5
,
121
152
(
1981
).
5.
J. R. Anderson, Learning and Memory: An Integrative Approach (Wiley, New York, 1999), 2nd ed.;
H. Simon and C. Kaplan, “Foundations of Cognitive Science,” in Foundations of Cognitive Science, edited by M. Posner (MIT, Cambridge, 1989).
6.
D. Halliday, R. Resnick, and J. Walker, Fundamentals of Physics (Wiley, New York, 1997), 5th ed., p. 291, Prob. 16P.
7.
The problem posed to the students had the following additional sentences at the end: For example, will vf be larger or smaller if the wheel fell on ice with small friction compared to a rough surface? Describe your intuition along with the reasoning. You must draw a diagram and explain your approach to get full credit.
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.