REFERENCES
1.
R. R.
Hake
, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
(1
), 64
–74
(1998
) and http://www.physics.indiana.edu/∼sdi/.2.
R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods in mechanics instruction,” APS Forum on Education Newsletter, Summer 1998,pp. 5–7 and http://www.physics.indiana.edu/∼sdi/.
3.
R. R.
Hake
, “Lessons from the physics education reform effort
,” Conserv. Ecol.
5
(2
), 28
(2002
); http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art28.4.
R. R. Hake, “Physics First: Precursor to science/math literacy for all?” APS Forum on Education Newsletter, Summer 2002 (in press).
5.
R. R.
Hake
, “Is it finally time to implement Curriculum S?
,” AAPT Announcer
30
(4
), 103
(2000
) and http://www.physics.indiana.edu/∼hake.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2002
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
