REFERENCES
1.
The description of the Rutgers program is based in part on an article in the July 2001 issue of Physics and Society, the newsletter of the Forum on Physics and Society of the American Physical Society, which is accessible through http://www.aps.org.
2.
J.
Shapiro
, “Electronic student response found feasible in large science lecture hall
,” J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
26
, 408
–412
(1997
).We have also purchased keypads from Educue, 351 Alplaus Ave., Alplaus, NY 12008, http://www.educue.com.
3.
See, for example, WebAssign, Box 8202, NCSU, Raleigh, NC 27695, http://www.webassign.net.
4.
E.
Etkina
, K.
Gibbons
, B. L.
Holton
, and G. K.
Horton
, “Lessons learned. A case study of an integrated way of teaching introductory physics to at-risk students at Rutgers University
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
, 810
–818
(1999
).5.
G.
Pallrand
and P.
Lindenfeld
, “The physics classroom revisited: Have we learned our lesson?
,” Phys. Today
38
(11
), 46
–52
(1985
).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2002
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
