The Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism (CSEM) was developed to assess students’ knowledge about topics in electricity and magnetism. The survey is a 32-question, multiple-choice test that can be used as both a pretest and posttest. During four years of testing and refinement, the survey has been given in one form or another to more than 5000 introductory physics students at 30 different institutions. Typical pretest results are that students in calculus-based courses get 31% of the questions correct and student’s in algebra/trigonometry-based courses average 25% correct. Posttest correct results only rise to 47% and 44%, respectively. From analysis of student responses, a number of student difficulties in electricity and magnetism are indicated.
REFERENCES
1.
J.
Clement
, “Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics
,” Am. J. Phys.
50
, 66
–71
(1982
).2.
3.
(a)
I.
Halloun
and D.
Hestenes
, “The initial knowledge state of college physics students
,” Am. J. Phys.
53
, 1
–43
–1055 (1985
);(b)
I.
Halloun
and D.
Hestenes
, “Common sense concepts about motion
,” Am. J. Phys.
53
, 1056
–1065
(1985
).4.
F. M.
Goldberg
and L. C.
McDermott
, “An investigation of student understanding of the real image formed by a converging lens or converging mirror
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
, 108
–119
(1987
).5.
L. C.
McDermott
, “Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned—closing the gap
,” Am. J. Phys.
59
, 301
–315
(1991
).6.
D.
Hestenes
, M.
Wells
, and G.
Swackhamer
, “Force Concept Inventory
,” Phys. Teach.
30
, 141
–151
(1992
).7.
R. R.
Hake
, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
, 64
–74
(1998
).8.
L.
Viennot
and S.
Rainson
, “Students reasoning about the superposition of electric fields
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
14
, 475
–487
(1992
).9.
B.
Eylon
and U.
Ganiel
, “Macro-micro relationships: the missing link between electrostatics and electrodynamics in students’ reasoning
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
12
, 79
–94
(1990
).10.
I.
Galilli
, “Mechanics background influences students’ conceptions in electromagnetism
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
17
, 371
–387
(1995
).11.
C.
Guruswamy
, M. D.
Somers
, and R. G.
Hussey
, “Students’ understanding of the transfer of charge between conductors
,” Phys. Educ.
32
, 91
–96
(1997
).12.
S.
Tornkvist
, K. A.
Pettersson
, and G.
Transtromer
, “Confusion by representation: on students’ comprehension of the electric field concept
,” Am. J. Phys.
61
, 335
–338
(1993
).13.
S.
Rainson
, G.
Transtromer
, and L.
Viennot
, “Students’ understanding of the superposition of electric fields
,” Am. J. Phys.
62
, 1026
–1032
(1994
).14.
E.
Bagno
and B. S.
Eylon
, “From problem solving to a knowledge structure: An example from the domain of electromagnetism
,” Am. J. Phys.
65
, 726
–736
(1997
).15.
D. E. Brown, “Teaching electricity with capacitors and causal models: preliminary results from diagnostic and tutoring study data examining the CASTLE Project,” paper presented at NARST annual meeting, Boston, MA (1992).
16.
P. V.
Engelhardt
and R. J.
Beichner
, “Test development incorporating introductory electrical circuit misconceptions
,” AAPT Announcer
24
, 2
, 54
(1994
).17.
C.
Hieggelke
and T.
O’Kuma
, “The Impact of Physics Education Research on the Teaching of Scientists and Engineers at Two Year Colleges,” in The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities: Proceedings of ICUPE, edited by E. F. Redish and J. S. Rigden (American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY, 1997), pp. 267–287.18.
R. K.
Thornton
and D. R.
Sokoloff
, “Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
, 338
–352
(1998
).19.
R. J.
Beichner
, “Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs
,” Am. J. Phys.
62
, 750
–762
(1994
).20.
G.
Aubrecht
and J.
Aubrecht
, “Constructing objective tests
,” Am. J. Phys.
51
, 613
–620
(1983
).21.
J. C. Marshall and L. W. Hales, Classroom Test Construction (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1971).
22.
R.
Harrington
, “Discovering the reasoning behind the words: an example from electrostatics
,” Physics Education Research Supplement
, 1
, S58
–S59
(1999
).23.
This gain is found by (posttest percent-pretest percent)/(1-pretest percent).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2001
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.