We describe a new curriculum for the final two years of a B.S. program in Physics. Case studies in the junior year provide concrete examples or Paradigms as pillars to support systematic Capstone lectures in the senior year. In each of nine three-week Paradigms, the junior progresses from a descriptive lower-division understanding to an advanced analysis of a topic defined by phenomenon rather than discipline. Students generally view the new format with favor. They are better at visualization and make important connections among physics disciplines. Independent assessment is ongoing.

1.
D. H.
McIntyre
, “
Using Great Circles to Understand Motion on a Rotating Sphere
,”
Am. J. Phys.
68
,
1097
1105
(
2000
).
2.
E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1997).
3.
D. R. Sokoloff and R. K. Thornton, “Using Interactive Lecture Demonstrations to Create an Active Learning Environment,” Phys. Teach. (to be published).
4.
Some institutions, such as Colorado College, use an intensive format throughout.
5.
R.
Karplus
, “
Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
14
,
169
175
(
1977
).
6.
B. Inhelder and J. Piaget, The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence (Basic Books, New York, 1958).
7.
D.
Zollman
, “
Learning Cycles in a Large Enrollment Class
,”
Phys. Teach.
28
,
20
25
(
1990
).
8.
A. B.
Arons
, “
Student Patterns of Thinking and Reasoning. 1, 2, and 3
,”
Phys. Teach.
21
,
576
581
(
1983
);
A. B.
Arons
,
Phys. Teach.
22
,
21
26
(
1984
);
A. B.
Arons
,
Phys. Teach.
22
,
88
93
(
1984
).
9.
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Conceptual Understanding in Mechanics
,”
Phys. Today
37
(
7
),
24
32
(
1984
).
10.
S. Tobias, They’re not Dumb, They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier (Research Corporation, Tucson, 1989).
11.
D.
Hestenes
,
M.
Wells
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
Force Concept Inventory
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
141
151
(
1992
).
12.
P.
Laws
, “
Workshop Physics: Learning Introductory Physics by Doing It
,”
Change Magazine
23
(
July/August
),
20
27
(
1991
).
13.
The Consortium for Upper-Level Physics Software, edited by W. MacDonald, M. Dworzecka, and R. Ehrlich (Wiley, New York, 1996).
14.
D. V.
Schroeder
and
T. A.
Moore
, “
A computer-simulated Stern–Gerlach laboratory
,”
Am. J. Phys.
61
,
798
805
(
1993
).
15.
L. C. McDermott et al., Tutorials in Introductory Physics (Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998).
16.
C. A. Manogue and K. S. Mayer, “Visualization in Upper-Division Physics” (unpublished).
17.
K. S. Meyer, “The Integration of Interactive Activities into Lecture in Upper Division Physics Theory Courses,” Master’s Project, Department of Physics, Oregon State University, 1998.
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.