We report data from ten years of teaching with Peer Instruction (PI) in the calculus- and algebra-based introductory physics courses for nonmajors; our results indicate increased student mastery of both conceptual reasoning and quantitative problem solving upon implementing PI. We also discuss ways we have improved our implementation of PI since introducing it in 1991. Most notably, we have replaced in-class reading quizzes with pre-class written responses to the reading, introduced a research-based mechanics textbook for portions of the course, and incorporated cooperative learning into the discussion sections as well as the lectures. These improvements are intended to help students learn more from pre-class reading and to increase student engagement in the discussion sections, and are accompanied by further increases in student understanding.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2001
PAPERS|
September 01 2001
Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results
Catherine H. Crouch;
Catherine H. Crouch
Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Search for other works by this author on:
Eric Mazur
Eric Mazur
Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 69, 970–977 (2001)
Article history
Received:
April 21 2000
Accepted:
March 15 2001
Citation
Catherine H. Crouch, Eric Mazur; Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. Am. J. Phys. 1 September 2001; 69 (9): 970–977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A simple model of a gravitational lens from geometric optics
Bogdan Szafraniec, James F. Harford
Playing with active matter
Angelo Barona Balda, Aykut Argun, et al.
The physics of “everesting” on a bicycle
Martin Bier
The hardest-hit home run?
Donald C. Warren
Related Content
Effective variations of peer instruction: The effects of peer discussions, committing to an answer, and reaching a consensus
Am. J. Phys. (August 2016)
The effect of grading incentive on student discourse in Peer Instruction
Am. J. Phys. (August 2006)
Peer Tutoring in Web‐based ConcepTests
The Physics Teacher (January 2010)
Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college
Am. J. Phys. (November 2008)
A Study of Peer Instruction Methods with High School Physics Students
AIP Conference Proceedings (October 2008)