It has been shown that Newtonian classical mechanics (NCM) suffers from several kinds of chaotic indeterminacies. That means, a large set of problems treated with NCM gives results which are in wild disagreement with observation. In the present paper, these shortcomings are repaired in a simple, obvious, and essentially unique manner. The NCM theory is thereby transformed into a new theory which is fully equivalent to the Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and Dirac nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, with the vital addition of Born’s probabilistic interpretation of the wave function built in from the start. I call this new theory “super classical quantum mechanics” (SCQM). Using Ehrenfest’s theorem of 1927, the classical limit of the new theory, SCQM, is seen to give exactly the results expected of the repaired Newtonian theory of classical mechanics.
REFERENCES
1.
W. E.
Lamb
, Jr., “On the electromagnetic properties of nuclear systems
,” Phys. Rev.
53
, 651
–656
(1938
).2.
W. E.
Lamb
, Jr., “Suppose Newton had invented wave mechanics
,” Am. J. Phys.
62
, 201
–206
(1994
).3.
W. E.
Lamb
, Jr., “The borderland between quantum and classical mechanics
,” Phys. Scr.
T70
, 7
–13
(1997
).4.
W. E.
Lamb
, Jr., “An operational interpretation of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics
,” Phys. Today
22
(4
), 23
–28
(1969
).5.
J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, English translated by R. T. Beyer (Princeton U.P., Princeton, NJ, 1955).
6.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Von Neumann’s reduction of the wave function,” in The Centrality of Science and Absolute Values, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Unity of the Sciences (ICF, New York, 1975), pp. 297–303.
7.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Remarks on the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” in Science of Matter, edited by S. Fujita (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1979), pp. 1–8.
8.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “A letter to Kip Thorne,” in CCNY Physics Symposium, in Celebration of Melvin Lax’s Sixtieth Birthday, edited by H. Falk (City University of New York, New York, 1983), pp. 40–43.
9.
E.
Arthurs
and J.
Kelly
, “On the simultaneous measurement of a pair of conjugate observables
,” Bell Syst. Tech. J.
44
, 725
–729
(1965
).10.
W. E.
Lamb
, Jr., “Quantum theory of measurement
,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.
480
, 407
–416
(1986
).11.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Theory of quantum mechanical measurements,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: In the Light of New Technology, edited by M. Namiki (Japan Physical Society, 1987), pp. 185–192.
12.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Sequential measurements in quantum mechanics,” Lecture at Como NATO Advanced Research Workshop in Quantum Optics, September, 1986, in Quantum Measurement and Chaos, edited by E. R. Pike and S. Sarkar (Plenum, New York, 1987), pp. 183–193.
13.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Classical measurements on a quantum mechanical system,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spacetime Symmetries, edited by Y. S. Kim and W. M. Zachary (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989), pp. 197–201 [reprinted from Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 6 (1989)].
14.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Quantum theory of measurement,” in Lecture at Turin NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Noise and Chaos in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, March, 1989, edited by F. Moss, L. Lugiato, and W. Schleich (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, UK, 1990), pp. 1–14.
15.
Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Princeton U.P., Princeton, NJ, 1983).
16.
S.
Goldstein
, “Quantum theory without observers
,” Phys. Today
51
, 42
–47
(1998
);A. Zeilinger, “Experiment and the foundation of quantum physics,” pp. 482–498 in More Things in Heaven and Earth, A Celebration of Physics at the Millennium, edited by B. Bederson (Springer, New York, 1999);
a conference, overloaded with such ideas, was recently held at Lake Garda, Italy, September (2000) (unpublished).
17.
See also,
J. G.
Cramer
, “Transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics
,” Rev. Mod. Phys.
58
, 647
–688
(1986
);See also, G. Auletta, Foundations and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000).
18.
See, however,
W. E.
Lamb
, Jr., “Laser theory and Doppler effect
,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.
QE-20
, 551
–554
(1984
).19.
See the Schrödinger cat paradox, in Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Princeton U.P., Princeton, NJ, 1983), pp. 152–167.
20.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Schrödinger’s Cat,” in Paul Adrian Maurice Dirac, edited by B. N. Kursunoglu and E. P. Wigner (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, UK, 1987).
21.
G. Auletta, “Delayed choice experiments,” Foundations and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000), Chap. 26, footnote 17.
22.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Comments by W. E. Lamb,” in Workshop on Quantum Cryptography and Quantum Computing, Proceedings, February 15, 1995, edited by H. Everitt (U.S. Army Research Office, 1995), pp. 24 and 25.
23.
M. Born, “On the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,” in Les Prix Nobel (Stockholm, 1954).
24.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., and H. Fearn, “Classical Theory of measurement: A big step toward the quantum theory of measurement,” in Amazing Light, a volume dedicated to Charles Hard Townes on his 80th Birthday, edited by R. V. Chiao (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996).
25.
See a biography of Maria Gaetana Agnesi, and also an article on special mathematical functions in recent editions of the Encyclopedia Britannica. A Lorentzian curve is often confused with the Witch of Agnesi.
26.
J. G. Crowther, “Maxwell’s inaugural lecture,” New Scientist Sci. J. 478–481 (1971).
27.
H. Poincaré, in New Methods of Celestial Mechanics, edited by D. L. Goroff (AIP, Woodbury, NY, 1993), Vols. 1–3.
28.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Quantum chaos and the theory of measurement,” in Chaotic Behavior in Quantum Systems. Theory and Applications, edited by G. Casati, NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Quantum Chaos, Como, June, 1983 (Plenum, New York, 1985), pp. 253–261.
29.
J.
Lighthill
, “The recently recognized failure of predictability in Newtonian dynamics
,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
407
, 35
–50
(1936
).30.
G. Duffing, Forced Vibrations at Various Frequencies and their Technical Significance (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1918), pp. 41 and 42.
31.
E. Fermi, J. R. Pasta, and S. Ulam, “Studies of nonlinear problems,” in Los Alamos Report No. LA-1940 (1955).
32.
33.
M. Born, Waynflete Lecture, Magdalen College, Oxford (1949) (unpublished).
34.
P.
Ehrenfest
, “Notes on the approximate validity of quantum mechanics
,” Z. Phys.
45
, 455
–457
(1927
).35.
L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955), pp. 178–182.
36.
E. Schrödinger, Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics (Blackie, London, 1928).
37.
E. H.
Kennard
, “The quantum mechanics of simple types of motion
,” Z. Phys.
44
, 326
–352
(1927
).38.
R. J.
Glauber
, “Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field
,” Phys. Rev.
131
, 2766
–2788
(1963
).39.
M. Sargent, M. O. Scully, and W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Laser Physics,” in Appendix H, The Coherent State (Wiley, New York, 1977), Appendix H. This is largely based on Kennard’s approach. Many results are simpler to get using the complex Gaussian method of this paper.
40.
W. E.
Lamb
, Jr., “Antiphoton
,” Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt.
60
, 77
–84
(1995
).41.
J.
Bolte
and S.
Keppeler
, “Semiclassical time evolution and trace formula for relativistic spin- particles
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
81
, 1987
–1990
(1998
).42.
M. V. Berry, From a Lecture in May, 1999, at the University of Arizona (unpublished).
43.
T. A.
Welton
, “Some observable effects of the quantum mechanical fluctuation of the electromagnetic field
,” Phys. Rev.
74
, 1157
–1167
(1948
).44.
S.
Bourzeix
et al., “High resolution spectroscopy of the hydrogen atom: Determination of the Lamb shift
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
76
, 384
–387
(1996
).45.
See Einstein’s Remarks on Radioactive Decay in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, edited by P. A. Schilpp (Open Court, La Salle, IL, 1970), pp. 665–688.
46.
See E. T. Whittaker, History of the Theories of the Aether and Electricity (Nelson, London, 1951–1953).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2001 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2001
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
