This paper is an introduction to an elegant and powerful technique in modern optics: Pound–Drever–Hall laser frequency stabilization. This introduction is primarily meant to be conceptual, but it includes enough quantitative detail to allow the reader to immediately design a real setup, suitable for research or industrial application. The intended audience is both the researcher learning the technique for the first time and the teacher who wants to cover modern laser locking in an upper-level physics or electrical engineering course.

1.
R. W. P. Drever et al., “A Gravity-Wave Detector Using Optical Cavity Sensing,” in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, Jena, July 1980, edited by E. Schmutzer (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1983), pp. 265–267.
2.
R. W. P.
Drever
et al., “
Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator
,”
Appl. Phys. B: Photophys. Laser Chem.
31
,
97
105
(
1983
).
3.
A.
Abromovici
et al., “
LIGO: The laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory
,”
Science
256
,
325
333
(
1992
).
4.
S.
Seel
,
R.
Storz
,
G.
Ruoso
,
J.
Mlynek
, and
S.
Schiller
, “
Cryogenic optical resonators: A new tool for laser frequency stabilization at the 1 Hz level
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
78
(
25
),
4741
4744
(
1997
).
5.
L. A.
Rawley
et al., “
Millisecond Pulsar PSR 1937+21: A Highly Stable Clock
,”
Science
238
,
761
765
(
1987
).
6.
Axel
Schenzle
,
Ralph G.
DeVoe
, and
Richard G.
Brewer
, “
Phase-modulation laser spectroscopy
,”
Phys. Rev. A
25
,
2606
2621
(
1982
).
7.
G. C.
Bjorklund
et al., “
Frequency Modulation (FM) Spectroscopy: Theory of Line shapes and Signal-to-Noise Analysis
,”
Appl. Phys. B: Photophys. Laser Chem.
32
,
145
152
(
1983
).
8.
Gary C.
Bjorklund
, “
Frequency-modulation spectroscopy: A new method for measuring weak absorptions and dispersions
,”
Opt. Lett.
5
,
15
17
(
1980
).
9.
R. V.
Pound
, “
Electronic Frequency Stabilization of Microwave Oscillators
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
17
,
490
505
(
1946
).
10.
R. A.
Boyd
,
J. L.
Bliss
, and
K. G.
Libbrecht
, “
Teaching physics with 670-nm diode lasers—experiments with Fabry–Perot cavities
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
,
1109
1116
(
1996
).
11.
Eugene Hecht, Optics (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998).
12.
Grant R. Fowles, Introduction to Modern Optics (Dover, New York, 1975).
13.
G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell, and A. Emami-Naeni, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1987).
14.
B. Friedland, Control System Design: An Introduction to State Space Methods (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1986).
15.
H.
Kogelnik
and
T.
Li
, “
Laser beams and resonators
,”
Appl. Opt.
5
,
1550
1567
(
1966
).
16.
A. E. Siegman. Lasers (University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA, 1986).
17.
Amnon Yariv, Optical Electronics in Modern Communications (Oxford U.P., New York, 1997).
18.
Peter R. Saulson, Fundamentals of Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
19.
R. L.
Barger
,
M. S.
Sorem
, and
J. L.
Hall
, “
Frequency stabilization of a cw dye laser
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
22
,
573
575
(
1973
).
20.
The Pockels cell actually modulates the laser’s phase, but the distinction between phase and frequency modulation is irrelevant for the conceptual model.
21.
The reader who doesn’t like Bessel functions will find that the small angle expansion, Einc≈E0[1+iβ sin Ωt]eiωt=E0[1+(β/2)(eiΩt−e−iΩt)]eiωt works just about as well.
22.
There may also be some contribution from higher order terms that we neglected when we expanded ei(ωt+β sin Ωt) in terms of Bessel functions. These may make a significant contribution to the 2Ω term, but we do not need to consider them in this tutorial.
23.
J. B. Camp, H. Yamamoto, S. E. Whitcomb, and D. E. McClelland, “Analysis of Light Noise Sources in a Recycled Michelson Interferometer with Fabry–Perot Arms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (to be published).
24.
You can get around this quantum limit to some extent by squeezing the light, but that is beyond the scope of this article.
25.
T. T. Lyons, M. W. Regehr, and F. J. Raab. “Shot Noise in Gravitational-Wave Detectors with Fabry–Perot Arms” (unpublished).
26.
The shot noise limit does depend implicitly on the power in the sidebands, since Pc=P0−Ps, but this is a relatively minor effect.  
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.