The study reported here was designed to substantiate the findings of previous research on the use of inquiry-based laboratory activities in introductory college physics courses. The authors sought to determine whether limited use of inquiry activities as a supplement to a traditional lecture and demonstration curriculum would improve student achievement in introductory classes for preservice teachers and general education students. Achievement was measured by responses to problems designed to test conceptual understanding as well as overall course grades. We analyzed the effect on selected student outcome measures in a preliminary study in which some students engaged in inquiry activities and others did not, and interviewed students about their perceptions of the inquiry activities. In the preliminary study, preservice elementary teachers and female students showed significantly higher achievement after engaging such activities, but only on exam questions relating directly to the material covered in the exercises. In a second study we used a common exam problem to compare the performance of students who had engaged in a revised version of the inquiry activities with the performance of students in algebra and calculus-based classes. The students who had engaged in inquiry investigations significantly outperformed the other students.
REFERENCES
1.
Lillian C.
McDermott
and Edward F.
Redish
, “Resource letter PER-1:Physics education research
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
(9
), 755
–767
(1999
).2.
Edward R.
Redish
, “Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
62
(9
), 796
–803
(1994
).3.
Patricia M.
Stohr-Hunt
, “An analysis of frequency of hands-on experience and science achievement
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
33
(1
), 101
–109
(1996
).4.
James A.
Shymansky
, Larry V.
Hedges
, and George
Woodworth
, “A reassessment of the effects of the inquiry-based science curricula of the 60’s on student performance
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
27
(2
), 127
–144
(1990
). On a mean composite and individual measures of performance (including achievement, perceptions, and process skills), students in inquiry-based curricula outperformed other students at all grade levels, with the difference being significant at all grade levels except 4–6.5.
J. B.
Kahle
and A.
Damnjanovic
, “The effect of inquiry activities on elementary students’ enjoyment, ease, and confidence in doing science: an analysis by sex and race
,” J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng.
1
, 17
–28
(1994
).6.
Ameican Association of University Women, How Schools Shortchange Girls (American Association of University Women, Washington DC, 1992), Executive Summary, p. 4.
7.
Daniel C.
Dobey
and Larry E.
Schafer
, “The effects of knowledge on elementary science inquiry teaching
,” Sci. Educ.
68
(1
), 39
–51
(1984
).8.
J. E.
Pedersen
and D. W.
McCurdy
, “The effects of hands-on, minds-on teaching experiences on attitudes of preservice elementary teachers
,” Sci. Educ.
76
(2
), 141
–146
(1992
).9.
Lillian C.
McDermott
, “Teacher education and the implementation of elementary science curricula
,” Am. J. Phys.
44
(5
), 434
–441
(1976
).10.
L. C.
McDermott
, “A perspective on teacher preparation in physics and other sciences: The need for special science courses for teachers
,” Am. J. Phys.
58
(8
), 734
–742
(1990
).11.
A. B. Arons, The Various Language (Oxford U.P., New York, 1977).
12.
Lillian C. McDermott, Physics by Inquiry (Wiley, New York, 1996), Vol. 1, pp. 3–42;
Vol. 2, pp. 383–418 and 639–669.
13.
B.
Thacker
, E.
Kim
, K.
Trefz
, and S. M.
Lea
, “Comparing problem solving performance of physics students in inquiry-based and traditional introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
62
(7
), 627
–633
(1994
).14.
S. M. Lea, “Adapting a research-based curriculum to disparate teaching environments: how to succeed in transporting inquiry-based physics instruction from university to university by really trying,” J. Coll. Sci. Teaching Feb 1993.
15.
P. W.
Laws
, P. J.
Rosborough
, and F. J.
Poodry
, “Women’s response to an activity-based introductory physics program
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
(7
), S32
–S37
(1999
).16.
H.
Wildy
and J.
Wallace
, “Understanding teaching or teaching for understanding: alternative frameworks for science classrooms
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
32
(2
), 143
–156
(1995
).17.
For example,
William H.
Schmidt
and Curtis C.
McKnight
, “What can we really learn from TIMSS?
” Science
282
, 1830
–1831
(1998
). The Third International Math and Science Study (TIMSS) reviewed science education at three different grade levels in over 40 countries. The complete reports are available at www.csteep.bc.edu/TIMSS.18.
Richard R.
Hake
, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
(1
), 64
–74
(1998
).19.
R. R.
Hake
, “Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
(1
), 64
–74
(1998
).20.
E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual (Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997).
21.
D.
Hestenes
, M.
Wells
, and G.
Swackhammer
, “Force concept inventory
,” Phys. Teach.
30
(3
), 141
–158
(1992
);revised by Ibrahim Halloun, Richard Hake, and Eugene Mosca, http://modeling.la.asu.edu/modeling/R&E/Research.html (1995).
22.
Lillian C. McDermott and Peter S. Shaffer, Tutorials in Introductory Physics, preliminary ed. (Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1998), pp. 93–107.
23.
Peter S.
Shaffer
and Lillian C.
McDermott
, “Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II: Design of instructional strategies
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
(11
), 1003
–1013
(1992
).24.
25.
Edward F.
Redish
and Richard N.
Steinberg
, “Teaching Physics: Figuring Out What Works
,” Phys. Today
52
(1
), 24
–30
(1999
).26.
Jeffery M.
Saul
and Edward F.
Redish
, “A comparison of pre- and post-FCI results for innovative and traditional introductory calculus-based physics classes
,” AAPT Announcer
28
, 80
(July 1998
).27.
P. Laws, Workshop Physics Activity Guide (Wiley, New York, 1997).
28.
Lillian C.
McDermott
and Peter S.
Shaffer
, “Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
(11
), 1003
–1013
(1992
).29.
Ibrahim Abou
Halloun
and David
Hestenes
, “The initial knowledge state of college physics students
,” Am. J. Phys.
53
(11
), 1043
–1065
(1985
).30.
Lillian C.
McDermott
, “Guest comment: How we teach and how students learn—A mismatch?
” Am. J. Phys.
61
(4
), 295
–298
(1993
).31.
Lillian Christie
McDermott
, “Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned—Closing the gap
,” Am. J. Phys.
59
(4
), 301
–315
(1991
).32.
Paula Scott and Marion Dennison, “Marble Coasters,” in Amusement Park Physics Curriculum Manual, 2nd ed., edited by J. R. Dennison (Utah State University Physics Department, Logan, UT, 1996), pp. F17–F20.
33.
Arnold B. Arons, A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching (Wiley, New York, 1990), Chap. 5, pp. 118–121;
Chap. 9, pp. 202–208.
34.
Elementary Science Study (Education Development Center, Newton, MA, 1968).
35.
J. P.
Shaver
, “What statistical significance testing is, and what it is not
,” J. Exp. Educ.
61
(4
), 293
–316
(1993
).36.
M. D. Shipman, The Limitations of Social Research, 3rd ed. (Longman, London, 1988).
37.
W. Borg, M. Gall, and J. Gall, Educational Research: An Introduction, 6th ed. (Longman, London, 1996).
38.
J. P. Goetz and M. D. LeCompte, Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research (Academic, Orlando, FL, 1984).
39.
M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Evaluation Methods (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1980).
40.
Marcia
Linn
, “Free-choice experiences: how do they help children learn?
” Sci. Educ.
64
, 237
–248
(1980
).41.
Thomas R.
Brown
, T. F.
Slater
and J. P.
Adams
, “Gender differences with batteries and bulbs
,” Phys. Teach.
17
(3
), 311
–323
(1995
).42.
G. D.
Thijs
and G. M.
Bosch
, “Cognitive effects of science experiments focusing on student’s preconceptions of force: a comparison of demonstrations and small-group practicals
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
36
, 526
–527
(1998
).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2000 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2000
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
