A perfectly happy ball is one that bounces to its original height when dropped on a massive, rigid surface. A completely unhappy ball does not bounce at all. In the former case, the coefficient of restitution (COR) is unity. In the latter case, the COR is zero. It is shown that when an unhappy ball collides with a happy ball, the COR increases from zero to unity as the stiffness of the happy ball decreases from infinity to zero. The COR is independent of the mass of each ball. The implication of reducing the COR of a tennis ball, as a possible means of slowing the serve in tennis, is also considered. It is shown that (a) the COR for a collision with a racket varies with the impact point and is a maximum at the vibration node near the center of the strings, and (b) the serve speed is reduced by only about 20% if the COR for a bounce on the court is reduced to zero.

Topics
Rigid body dynamics
1.
Arbor Scientific, www.arborsci.com or P.O. Box 2750, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-2750.
2.
Newton was the first to make detailed measurements on the impact of imperfectly elastic bodies and to describe such collisions in terms of what is now known as the coefficient of restitution. In doing so, Newton extended the laws of impact previously established by Wren, Wallis, Huygens, and Mariotte for perfectly hard or perfectly elastic bodies. A fascinating historical account is given by R. Dugas, Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century (Central Book, New York, 1958).
3.
S. P.
Hendee
,
R. M.
Greenwald
, and
J. J.
Crisco
, “
Static and dynamic properties of various baseballs
,”
J. Appl. Biomech.
14
,
390
–
400
(
1998
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
4.
W. Goldsmith, Impact (Arnold, London, 1960), pp. 257–288.
5.
D.
Auerbach
, “
Colliding rods: dynamics and relevance to colliding balls
,”
Am. J. Phys.
62
,
522
–
525
(
1994
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
6.
H.
Brody
, “
Physics of the tennis racket
,”
Am. J. Phys.
47
,
482
–
487
(
1979
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
G.
Barnes
, “
Study of collisions
,”
Am. J. Phys.
26
,
5
–
12
(
1957
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
R.
Cross
, “
The bounce of a ball
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
222
–
227
(
1999
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
H.
Brody
, “
The physics of tennis. III. The ball–racket interaction
,”
Am. J. Phys.
65
,
981
–
987
(
1997
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
L. L.
Van Zandt
, “
The dynamical theory of the baseball bat
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
,
172
–
181
(
1992
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
R.
Cross
, “
Impact of a ball with a bat or racket
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
692
–
702
(
1999
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2000 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2000
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.