The statistical definition of entropy is often used to justify Planck’s form of the third law of thermodynamics in a very graphic form. Statements like for a nondegenerate ground state system at 0 K, the system should be in its lowest energy (ground) state and then S=0 according to the statistical definition of entropy are commonplace in many textbooks. These statements are useful, but might as well be supplemented with more empirical views concerning the physical limits of low temperatures in thermodynamics and the high number of states still accessible for a macroscopic system when the entropy takes small values. The purpose of this note is to emphasize the above points making use of four model systems: the Fermi ideal gas, the confined Bose ideal gas, the photon gas, and the noninteracting particles in a two-level system. Each of these physical systems has a characteristic temperature related to the nature and organization of its microscopic constituents and the third law should perhaps be expressed in terms of the behavior of the system when it approaches this temperature rather than the presumed behavior at exactly
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2000
PAPERS|
October 01 2000
On the use of the statistical definition of entropy to justify Planck’s form of the third law of thermodynamics
Salvador Mafé;
Salvador Mafé
Department of Thermodynamics, Faculty of Physics, University of Valencia, E-46100 Burjasot, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
José A. Manzanares;
José A. Manzanares
Department of Thermodynamics, Faculty of Physics, University of Valencia, E-46100 Burjasot, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
Juan de la Rubia
Juan de la Rubia
Department of Thermodynamics, Faculty of Physics, University of Valencia, E-46100 Burjasot, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 68, 932–935 (2000)
Article history
Received:
April 07 1999
Accepted:
December 21 1999
Citation
Salvador Mafé, José A. Manzanares, Juan de la Rubia; On the use of the statistical definition of entropy to justify Planck’s form of the third law of thermodynamics. Am. J. Phys. 1 October 2000; 68 (10): 932–935. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1285849
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Ergodic Lagrangian dynamics in a superhero universe
I. L. Tregillis, George R. R. Martin
A simple Minkowskian time-travel spacetime
John D. Norton
All objects and some questions
Charles H. Lineweaver, Vihan M. Patel
Kepler's Moon puzzle—A historical context for pinhole imaging
Thomas Quick, Johannes Grebe-Ellis
The surprising subtlety of electrostatic field lines
Kevin Zhou, Tomáš Brauner
An undergraduate lab experiment on matched filtering as used in gravitational wave detection
Michael Daam, Antje Bergmann, et al.
Related Content
Teaching the First Law of Thermodynamics via Real‐Life Examples
The Physics Teacher (April 2011)
Photonic jet etching: Justifying the shape of optical fiber tip
AIP Conference Proceedings (February 2016)
Uniqueness of chemical equilibria in ideal mixtures of ideal gases
American Journal of Physics (September 2008)
How physicists disagree on the meaning of entropy
American Journal of Physics (April 2011)
What is a reversible process?
American Journal of Physics (July 2007)