The motion of wave packets can be easily determined for any Hamiltonian that is quadratic in position and momentum, even if the coefficients of the terms in the Hamiltonian vary with time. The method is based on the existence of an invariant operator, linear in position and momentum, the coefficients of these operators being solutions of the corresponding classical system. This immediately yields a set of very simple wave packets whose evolution is easily determined, and whose magnitude has the same form as the energy eigenfunctions of the harmonic oscillator (i.e., Gaussian or Hermite–Gaussian). This set provides a complete basis for finding the evolution of any state and the exact propagator is readily determined. For the harmonic oscillator, this set includes coherent states, squeezed states, displaced number states, and squeezed number states as special cases. The following important properties hold for every quadratic Hamiltonian, no matter what time dependence is present in the Hamiltonian: (1) The motion of the centroid of any wave packet separates from that of any moments relative to the centroid. (2) Every detail of the evolution of the quantum system can be calculated from the solutions of the corresponding classical system. (3) Wave functions of Gaussian (or Hermite–Gaussian) form will retain that form as they evolve.

1.
Eric J.
Heller
, “
Time-dependent approach to semiclassical dynamics
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
62
,
1544
1555
(
1975
);
V. G.
Bagrov
,
V. V.
Belov
, and
I. M.
Ternov
, “
Quasiclassical trajectory-coherent states of a particle in an arbitrary electromagnetic field
,”
J. Math. Phys.
24
,
2855
2859
(
1983
).
2.
H. R.
Lewis
and
W. R.
Riesenfeld
, “
An Exact Quantum Theory of the Time-Dependent Harmonic Oscillator and of a Charged Particle in a Time-Dependent Electromagnetic Field
,”
J. Math. Phys.
10
,
1458
1473
(
1969
).
3.
John G.
Hartley
and
John R.
Ray
, “
Coherent states for the time-dependent harmonic oscillator
,”
Phys. Rev. D
25
,
382
386
(
1982
).
4.
For a recent summary, see:
Michael Martin
Nieto
, “
Displaced and squeezed number states
,”
Phys. Lett. A
229
,
135
143
(
1997
).
5.
P.
Carruthers
and
M. M.
Nieto
, “
Coherent States and the Forced Quantum Oscillator
,”
Am. J. Phys.
33
,
537
544
(
1965
);
V. V.
Dodonov
,
I. A.
Malkin
, and
V. I.
Man’ko
, “
Coherent states of a charged particle in a time-dependent uniform electromagnetic field of a plane current
,”
Physica (Amsterdam)
59
,
241
256
(
1972
).
6.
James
Wei
and
Edward
Norman
, “
Lie algebraic solution of linear differential equations
,”
J. Math. Phys.
4
,
575
577
(
1963
);
Y.-Z.
Lai
,
J.-Q.
Liang
,
H. J. W.
Müller-Kirsten
, and
Jian-Ge
Zhou
, “
Time evolution of quantum systems with time-dependent Hamiltonian and the invariant Hermitian operator
,”
J. Phys. A
29
,
1773
1783
(
1996
).
7.
E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1970), 2nd ed., p. 165.
8.
See Ref. 7, p. 337, Eq. (15.12).
Also L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon, 1958), p. 9.
9.
M. A.
Gregório
and
A. S.
de Castro
, “
A particle moving in a homogeneous time-varying force
,”
Am. J. Phys.
52
,
557
559
(
1984
).
10.
M.
Hillery
,
R. F.
O’Connell
,
M. O.
Scully
, and
E. P.
Wigner
, “
Distribution Functions in Physics: Fundamentals
,”
Phys. Rep.
106
,
121
167
(
1984
), p. 140.
11.
For a discussion of this for the free particle, see
Hai-Woong
Lee
, “
Spreading of a free wave packet
,”
Am. J. Phys.
50
,
438
440
(
1982
).
12.
An alternative to this approach is to use Glauber’s displacement operator. See, for example,
M.
Boiteux
and
A.
Levelut
, “
Semicoherent states
,”
J. Phys. A
6
,
589
596
(
1973
).
13.
See Ref. 7, p. 61.
14.
E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1998), 3rd ed., p. 89.
15.
See Ref. 7, p. 164.
16.
See, for example, B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics (Wiley, New York, 1991), p. 51.
17.
R. M.
Cavalcanti
, “
The wave function of a Brownian particle
,” Los Alamos eprint: quant-ph/9805005, 2 May
1998
.
R. M.
Cavalcanti
,
Phys. Rev. E.
58
,
6807
6809
(
1998
).
18.
E.
Schrödinger
, “
Der stetige Übergang von der Mikro-zur Makromechanik
,”
Naturwissenschaften
14
,
664
(
1926
).
19.
E. H.
Kennard
, “
Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen
,”
Z. Phys.
44
,
326
(
1927
).
20.
I. R.
Senitzky
, “
Harmonic Oscillator Wave Functions
,”
Phys. Rev.
95
,
1115
1116
(
1954
).
21.
A graphical representation of the behaviour of a Gaussian wave packet near a saddle point has been given by
A.
Askar
and
J. H.
Weiner
, “
Wave Packet Dynamics on Two-Dimensional Quadratic Potential Surfaces
,”
Am. J. Phys.
39
,
1230
1234
(
1970
).
22.
For a discussion see Max Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966), p. 336.
23.
For more detail on these and higher moments see:
M.
Andrews
, “
The spreading of wave packets in quantum mechanics
,”
J. Phys. A
14
,
1123
1129
(
1981
); and
Mark
Andrews
and
Michael
Hall
, “
Evolution of moments over quantum wave packets or classical clusters
,”
J. Phys. A
18
,
37
44
(
1984
).
24.
For more detail on moments over sets of identical classical particles see
M.
Andrews
, “
The evolution of a cluster of particles and the invariants of a time-dependent oscillator
,”
Phys. Lett. A
83
,
95
97
(
1981
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.