One of the two normal modes of a system of two coupled nonlinear oscillators is subject to an instability. Several demonstration apparatus of weakly coupled oscillators that exhibit the instability are described. The effect is due to one normal mode parametrically driving the other, and occurs for the broad range of systems where the nonlinearity has a cubic contribution to the restoring force of each oscillator, which includes pendulums. The instability has an amplitude threshold that increases as the coupling is increased. A naive physical approach predicts that the mode opposite to that observed should be unstable. This is resolved by a weakly nonlinear analysis which reveals that the nonlinearity causes the linear frequency of a normal mode to depend upon the finite amplitude of the other mode. Numerical simulations confirm the theory, and extend the existence of the instability and the accuracy of the theoretical amplitude threshold beyond the regime of weak nonlinearity and weak coupling.

1.
A. B. Pippard, Response and Stability (Cambridge U.P., New York, 1985).
For other demonstrations of instabilities, refer to
Bruce
Denardo
,
Cecille
Pemberton
, and
Kumar
Bhatt
, “
Raising a circular body over a step
,”
Phys. Teach.
35
,
278
281
(
1997
);
Bruce
Denardo
,
Brad
Barber
,
Chris
Folley
, and
William
Wright
, “
Nonfrictional hysteresis in a rotating U-tube
,”
Am. J. Phys.
57
,
1126
1130
(
1989
);
Bruce
Denardo
,
William
Wright
,
Brad
Barber
, and
Chris
Folley
, “
A rotating U-tube experiment
,”
Am. J. Phys.
58
,
631
635
(
1990
).
2.
Paul
Chagnon
, “
Animated displays: Coupled mechanical oscillators
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
275
279
(
1992
);
R. E.
Benenson
and
B. B.
Marsh
, “
Coupled oscillations of a ball and a curved track pendulum
,”
Am. J. Phys.
56
,
345
348
(
1988
);
Joseph
Priest
and
James
Poth
, “
Teaching physics with coupled pendulums
,”
Phys. Teach.
20
,
80
85
(
1982
);
F. D.
Becchetti
and
A.
Dockrill
, “
Collision balls and coupled pendulums for the overhead projector
,”
Phys. Teach.
22
,
258
259
(
1984
);
R. D.
Edge
, “
Coupled and forced oscillations
,”
Phys. Teach.
19
,
485
488
(
1981
);
J. Morris
Blair
, “
Laboratory experiments involving the two-mode analysis of coupled oscillators
,”
Am. J. Phys.
39
,
555
557
(
1971
);
C. R.
Kannewurf
and
Harald
Jensen
, “
Coupled oscillations
,”
Am. J. Phys.
25
,
442
445
(
1957
);
Leonard O.
Olsen
, “
Coupled pendulums: An advanced laboratory experiment
,”
Am. J. Phys.
13
,
321
324
(
1945
).
3.
P. A.
DeYoung
,
D.
LaPointe
,
J.
Levy
, and
W.
Lorenz
, “
Nonlinear coupled oscillators and Fourier transforms: An advanced undergraduate laboratory
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
,
898
902
(
1996
).
4.
J. J.
Brehm
, “
Features of a nonlinear normal-mode problem
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
,
935
944
(
1996
).
5.
Ali H. Nayfeh and Dean T. Mook, Nonlinear Oscillations (Wiley, New York, 1979), pp. 26–27, 369–370, 379–387.
6.
Mark
Greiner
, “
Elliptical motion from a ball and spring
,”
Am. J. Phys.
48
,
488
489
(
1980
);
M. G.
Rusbridge
, “
Motion of the sprung pendulum
,”
Am. J. Phys.
48
,
146
151
(
1980
);
Lars
Falk
, “
Student experiments on parametric resonance
,”
Am. J. Phys.
47
,
325
328
(
1979
);
Lars
Falk
, “
Recurrence effects in the parametric spring pendulum
,”
Am. J. Phys.
46
,
1120
1123
(
1978
);
Thomas E.
Cayton
, “
The laboratory spring-mass oscillator: An example of parametric instability
,”
Am. J. Phys.
45
,
723
732
(
1977
);
M. G.
Olsson
, “
Why does a mass on a spring sometimes misbehave?
Am. J. Phys.
44
,
1211
1212
(
1976
).
7.
John A.
Elliott
, “
Intrinsic nonlinear effects in vibrating strings
,”
Am. J. Phys.
48
,
478
480
(
1980
).
8.
The parametric coupling plays an important role in driven strings. Refer to the following articles, and references therein:
Roger J.
Hanson
,
James M.
Anderson
, and
H. Kent
Macomber
, “
Measurements of nonlinear effects in a driven vibrating wire
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
1549
1556
(
1994
);
Ref. 5, pp. 485–500;
John A.
Elliott
, “
Nonlinear resonance in vibrating strings
,”
Am. J. Phys.
50
,
1148
1150
(
1980
).
9.
To our knowledge, the idea of the coupled pendulum arrangement in Fig. 1 is due to Robert Keolian (private communication).
10.
The coupling knot is motionless for the antisymmetric mode, so the linear frequency is identical to that of a single pendulum consisting of a bob suspended by two strings whose lengths are in general unequal. The bob moves in a plane inclined by an angle θ, where tan(θ)=(L1−L2)/(d1+d2), so the effective acceleration due to gravity is g cos(θ). The length of the equivalent simple pendulum is then R/cos(θ), where R=(L1d2+L2d1)/[(L1−L2)2+(d1+d2)2]1/2 is the radius of the bob’s trajectory. An alternative method is to solve for the equilibrium tensions in the strings, and then recognize that the effective linear spring constant is the sum of the vertical component of each tension divided by the vertical length of the corresponding string.
11.
Bruce Denardo, “Observations of Nonpropagating Oscillatory Solitons,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1990.
12.
Daedalon Corporation (Salem, MA). Telephone number: 800-233-2490.
13.
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Mechanics (Pergamon, New York, 1976), 3rd ed., pp. 80–87.
14.
See Ref. 5, pp. 20–26, Chap. 5.
15.
A. B. Pippard, The Physics of Vibration (Cambridge U.P., New York, 1989), Chap. 10.
16.
Jon Mathews and R. L. Walker, Mathematical Methods of Physics, 2nd ed. (Addison–Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1970), 2nd ed., pp. 198–204.
17.
Tai L. Chow, Classical Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1995), pp. 279–282.
18.
Fabrizio
Pinto
, “
Parametric resonance: An introductory experiment
,”
Phys. Teach.
31
,
336
346
(
1993
).
19.
Because Eq. (5) is only valid for ω near Ω, it is consistent and common to make the approximation Ω2−ω2≈2Ω(Ω−ω). For our investigations, the natural variable is the square of the frequency, so we do not make this approximation.
20.
Nicholas J. Giordano, Computational Physics (Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997), pp. 46–47, 84, 351.
21.
Fascination Toys and Gifts, Inc., Seattle, WA 98148. Telephone number: 206-244-9834.
22.
Paul
Chagnon
, “
The Roberval balance
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
238
238
(
1992
), and references therein.
23.
R. K. Dodd, J. C. Eilbeck, J. D. Gibbon, and H. C. Morris, Solitons and Nonlinear Wave Equations (Academic, New York, 1982), pp. 505–506, 526.
24.
Bruce
Denardo
and
William B.
Wright
, “
Structural properties of kinks and domain walls in nonlinear oscillatory lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. E
52
,
1094
1104
(
1995
);
Bruce
Denardo
,
Brian
Galvin
,
Andrés
Larraza
,
Alan
Greenfield
,
Seth
Putterman
, and
William
Wright
, “
Observations of localized structures in nonlinear lattices: Domain walls and kinks
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
68
,
1730
1733
(
1992
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.