Periodic orbit (PO) theory can be used to make connections between the quantum energy eigenvalue spectrum and the closed orbits of the corresponding classical system. The two-dimensional annular billiard or circular disk system (namely, a particle in the plane confined between inner and outer infinite circular walls at fR≡Rin<Rout≡R where 0<f<1) is examined in the context of periodic orbit theory to illustrate several novel aspects of the PO analysis. Important features of this problem include (i) the appearance and disappearance of various features in the classical path length spectrum as a parameter (in this case f=Rin/Rout), is continuously varied, (ii) the presence of path length features which do not correspond to classical trajectories, but are rather due to purely wavelike phenomena (namely, diffraction around the inner annulus), and (iii) the study of the contribution of different regions in the energy eigenvalue space to different classes of classical trajectories. This last feature is a general observation about periodic orbit theory which can be usefully applied to a number of billiard systems. In addition, since the annular disk system is seldom studied in detail in either classical or quantum mechanics, we provide an appendix which reviews some of the more traditional connections between the classical and quantum probability densities for this geometry, exemplifying some of the important differences between one- and two-dimensional systems which arise from purely geometrical rather than kinematical effects.

1.
See, e.g., R. L. Liboff, Introductory Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1991), pp. 555–556.
2.
R. W.
Robinett
, “
Quantum and classical probability distributions for position and momentum
,”
Am. J. Phys.
63
,
823
832
(
1995
).
3.
E. G.
Peter Rowe
, “
The classical limit of quantum mechanical hydrogenic radial distributions
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
8
,
81
87
(
1987
).
4.
R. W. Robinett, Quantum Mechanics: Classical Results, Modern Systems, and Visualized Examples (Oxford U. P., New York, 1997).
5.
R. W.
Robinett
, “
Visualizing the solutions for the circular infinite well in quantum and classical mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
,
440
446
(
1996
).
6.
J. R.
Merrill
, “
The propagation of quantum mechanical wave packets
,”
Am. J. Phys.
41
,
1101
1103
(
1973
).
7.
C. U.
Segre
and
J. D.
Sullivan
, “
Bound-state wave packets
,”
Am. J. Phys.
44
,
729
732
(
1976
).
8.
A.
Goldberg
,
H. M.
Schey
, and
J. L.
Schwartz
, “
Computer-generated motion pictures of one-dimensional quantum-mechanical transmission and reflection phenomena
,”
Am. J. Phys.
35
,
177
186
(
1967
).
9.
See, for example, J. R. Hiller, I. D. Johnston, and D. F. Styer, Quantum Mechanics Simulations: The Consortium for Upper-Level Physics Software (Wiley, New York, 1995).
10.
M. H.
Bramhall
, and
B. M.
Casper
, “
Reflections on a wave packet approach to quantum mechanical barrier penetration
,”
Am. J. Phys.
38
,
1136
1145
(
1970
).
For a related discussion, see also Ref. 11.
11.
B.
Diu
, “
Plane waves and wave packets in elementary quantum mechanics problems
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
1
,
231
240
(
1980
).
12.
J. S.
Boleman
and
S. B.
Haley
, “
More time-dependent calculations for the Schrödinger equation
,”
Am. J. Phys.
43
,
270
271
(
1975
).
13.
J. C.
Hamilton
,
J. L.
Schwartz
, and
W. A.
Bowers
, “
Computer generated films for solid state physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
40
,
1657
1972
(
1972
).
14.
G.
Friedmann
and
W. A.
Little
, “
A study of a wave function of a particle striking a crystal interface
,”
Am. J. Phys.
61
,
835
843
(
1993
).
15.
I.
Galbraith
,
Y. S.
Ching
, and
E.
Abraham
, “
Two-dimensional time-dependent quantum mechanical scattering event
,”
Am. J. Phys.
52
,
60
67
(
1984
).
16.
See Ref. 4, pp. 334–336, 356.
17.
R. W.
Robinett
, “
Visualizing classical periodic orbits from the quantum energy spectrum via the Fourier transform: Simple infinite well examples
,”
Am. J. Phys.
65
,
1167
1175
(
1997
).
For more specialized examples, see also Ref. 18.
18.
R. W.
Robinett
, “
Periodic orbit theory analysis of a continuous family of quasi-circular billiards
,”
J. Math. Phys.
39
,
278
298
(
1998
).
19.
K.
Richter
,
D.
Ullmo
, and
R. A.
Jalabert
, “
Orbital magnetism in the ballistic regime: geometrical effects
,”
Phys. Rep.
276
,
1
83
(
1996
).
20.
S. M.
Reimann
,
M.
Brack
,
A. G.
Magner
, and
M. V. N.
Murthy
, “
Applications of classical periodic orbit theory to circular billiards with small scattering centers
,”
Surf. Rev. Lett.
3
,
19
23
(
1996
).
21.
M. Brack and R. K. Bhaduri, Semiclassical Physics (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997).
22.
R. W.
Robinett
, “
Energy eigenvalues and periodic orbits for the circular disk or annular infinite well
,”
Surf. Rev. Lett.
5
,
519
526
(
1998
).
23.
R.
Balian
and
C.
Bloch
, “
Distribution of eigenfrequencies for the wave equation in a finite domain: III. Eigenfrequency density oscillations
,”
Ann. Phys.
69
,
76
160
(
1972
).
24.
J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1975), pp. 94–97.
25.
See, for example,
S. W.
McDonald
and
A. N.
Kaufman
, “
Spectrum and eigenfrequencies for a Hamiltonian with stochastic trajectories
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
64
,
1189
1191
(
1979
).
26.
H.-J.
Stöckman
and
J.
Stein
, “
Quantum’ chaos in billiards studied by microwave absorption
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
64
,
2215
2218
(
1990
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.