Students’ understanding of what science is about, how it is done, and their expectations as to what goes on in a science course, can play a powerful role in what they get out of introductory college physics. In this paper, we describe the Maryland Physics Expectations survey; a 34-item Likert-scale (agree–disagree) survey that probes student attitudes, beliefs, and assumptions about physics. We report on the results of pre- and post-instruction delivery of this survey to 1500 students in introductory calculus-based physics at six colleges and universities. We note a large gap between the expectations of experts and novices and observe a tendency for student expectations to deteriorate rather than improve as a result of the first term of introductory calculus-based physics.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
March 1998
Papers|
March 01 1998
Student expectations in introductory physics
Edward F. Redish;
Edward F. Redish
Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeffery M. Saul;
Jeffery M. Saul
Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard N. Steinberg
Richard N. Steinberg
Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Search for other works by this author on:
Edward F. Redish
Jeffery M. Saul
Richard N. Steinberg
Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Am. J. Phys. 66, 212–224 (1998)
Article history
Received:
May 19 1997
Accepted:
July 18 1997
Citation
Edward F. Redish, Jeffery M. Saul, Richard N. Steinberg; Student expectations in introductory physics. Am. J. Phys. 1 March 1998; 66 (3): 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18847
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All objects and some questions
Charles H. Lineweaver, Vihan M. Patel
Ergodic Lagrangian dynamics in a superhero universe
I. L. Tregillis, George R. R. Martin
Interplay between Airy and Coriolis precessions in a real Foucault pendulum
N. N. Salva, H. R. Salva
Solving introductory physics problems recursively using iterated maps
L. Q. English, D. P. Jackson, et al.
A simple derivation of relativistic energy and momentum
Ajoy Ghatak, Beth Parks
Related Content
Entropy and spontaneity in an introductory physics course for life science students
Am. J. Phys. (May 2014)
Concern about employability and the subfield choices of today’s graduate students
AIP Conf. Proc. (March 1978)
The distribution and change of student expectations in introductory physics
AIP Conf. Proc. (March 1997)
The Introductory University Physics Project 1987–1995: What has it accomplished?
Am. J. Phys. (February 1998)
Specific heats and the equipartition law in introductory textbooks
Am. J. Phys. (August 1996)