Many papers begin with the statement that Kamerlingh Onnes discovered superconductivity in 1911; one wonders what urged him to do the experiment that led to this discovery. Superconductivity was definitely not foreseen at that moment, and for many years the theory could not even predict it. Hence what drove Kamerlingh Onnes to measure the electrical resistivity at a temperature range where one could not expect to find anything radically new? What were the prevailing theories at that time? This is discussed after a general description of the man, his laboratory, and the state of physics in the preceding years. Conclusion: Although the driving factor in the low temperature resistance work was most likely the need for a reliable and reproducible thermometer, the speculations about what would happen in these regions were based on Kelvin’s theory, at least in the initial phase of the work. This theory predicted exactly the opposite of what was found eventually.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 1994
December 01 1994
Kamerlingh Onnes and the discovery of superconductivity
Paul H. E. Meijer
Paul H. E. Meijer
Physics Department, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 62, 1105–1108 (1994)
Article history
Received:
March 14 1994
Accepted:
June 17 1994
Citation
Paul H. E. Meijer; Kamerlingh Onnes and the discovery of superconductivity. Am. J. Phys. 1 December 1994; 62 (12): 1105–1108. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17669
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
Related Content
Kamerlingh Onnes Conference on Low‐Temperature Physics
Physics Today (October 1958)
Foucault Pendulum Experiment by Kamerlingh Onnes and Degenerate Perturbation Theory
American Journal of Physics (February 1970)
The Discovery of Superconductivity
Physics Today (September 1996)
Bad luck in attempts to make scientific discoveries
Physics Today (January 1967)
Solid‐State Physics at Microkelvin Temperatures: Is Anything Left to Learn?
Physics Today (January 1993)