It is demonstrated that the premisses of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paper are inconsistent when applied to quantum systems consisting of at least three particles. The demonstration reveals that the EPR program contradicts quantum mechanics even for the cases of perfect correlations. By perfect correlations is meant arrangements by which the result of the measurement on one particle can be predicted with certainty given the outcomes of measurements on the other particles of the system. This incompatibility with quantum mechanics is stronger than the one previously revealed for two‐particle systems by Bell’s inequality, where no contradiction arises at the level of perfect correlations. Both spin‐correlation and multiparticle interferometry examples are given of suitable three‐ and four‐particle arrangements, both at the gedanken and at the real experiment level.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 1990
Papers|
December 01 1990
Bell’s theorem without inequalities
Daniel M. Greenberger;
Daniel M. Greenberger
Department of Physics, City College of the City University of New York, New York, New York 10031
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael A. Horne;
Michael A. Horne
Department of Physics, Stonehill College, North Easton, Massachusetts 02357
Search for other works by this author on:
Abner Shimony;
Abner Shimony
Departments of Philosophy and Physics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Search for other works by this author on:
Anton Zeilinger
Anton Zeilinger
Atominstitut der Österreichischen Universitäten, Schüttelstrasse 115, A‐1020 Vienna, Austria
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131–1143 (1990)
Article history
Received:
June 10 1990
Accepted:
July 30 1990
Citation
Daniel M. Greenberger, Michael A. Horne, Abner Shimony, Anton Zeilinger; Bell’s theorem without inequalities. Am. J. Phys. 1 December 1990; 58 (12): 1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16243
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A simple model of a gravitational lens from geometric optics
Bogdan Szafraniec, James F. Harford
Playing with active matter
Angelo Barona Balda, Aykut Argun, et al.
The physics of “everesting” on a bicycle
Martin Bier
The hardest-hit home run?
Donald C. Warren
Related Content
Anti-Bell - Refutation of Bell's theorem
AIP Conference Proceedings (December 2012)
EPR Paradox, Locality and Completeness of Quantum Theory
AIP Conference Proceedings (December 2007)
Bell’s theorem: Does quantum mechanics contradict relativity?
American Journal of Physics (August 1987)
Ghostly action at a distance: A non-technical explanation of the Bell inequality
Am. J. Phys. (June 2016)
The EPR paradox, Bell’s inequality, and the question of locality
American Journal of Physics (January 2010)