Two ways of defining measurement events in quantum mechanics are discussed in the context of spin‐correlation analyses. The standard approach first leads to a reasonable model, which is now known to be unworkable, and then to a model employing superluminal connections. The alternative approach does not lead to models, but fits in well with one understanding of the Copenhagen interpretation and may help to clarify options in further developing that interpretation.

This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.