Some common errors exhibited by students in interpreting graphs in physics are illustrated by examples from kinematics. These are taken from the results of a descriptive study extending over a period of several years and involving several hundred university students who were enrolled in a laboratory‐based preparatory physics course. Subsequent testing indicated that the graphing errors made by this group of students are not idiosyncratic, but are found in different populations and across different levels of sophistication. This paper examines two categories of difficulty identified in the investigation: difficulty in connecting graphs to physical concepts and difficulty in connecting graphs to the real world. Specific difficulties in each category are discussed in terms of student performance on written problems and laboratory experiments. A few of the instructional strategies that have been designed to address some of these difficulties are described.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
June 1987
Papers|
June 01 1987
Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics
Lillian C. McDermott;
Lillian C. McDermott
Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark L. Rosenquist;
Mark L. Rosenquist
Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Search for other works by this author on:
Emily H. van Zee
Emily H. van Zee
Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Search for other works by this author on:
Lillian C. McDermott
Mark L. Rosenquist
Emily H. van Zee
Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Am. J. Phys. 55, 503–513 (1987)
Article history
Received:
February 21 1986
Accepted:
May 21 1986
Citation
Lillian C. McDermott, Mark L. Rosenquist, Emily H. van Zee; Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. Am. J. Phys. 1 June 1987; 55 (6): 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15104
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All objects and some questions
Charles H. Lineweaver, Vihan M. Patel
Ergodic Lagrangian dynamics in a superhero universe
I. L. Tregillis, George R. R. Martin
Interplay between Airy and Coriolis precessions in a real Foucault pendulum
N. N. Salva, H. R. Salva
It is time to honor Emmy Noether with a momentum unit
Geoff Nunes, Jr.
Solving introductory physics problems recursively using iterated maps
L. Q. English, D. P. Jackson, et al.
Related Content
A conceptual approach to teaching kinematics
Am. J. Phys. (May 1987)
Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs
Am. J. Phys. (August 1994)
Interpreting kinematics graph: What do students’ show?
AIP Conf. Proc. (December 2022)
Student difficulties in translating between mathematical and graphical representations in introductory physics
AIP Conf. Proc. (January 2013)
Achievements of Montenegrian high-school students in Tugk test (test of understanding graphs – kinematics)
AIP Conf. Proc. (March 2016)