We discuss a relativistic particle affected simultaneously by two static potentials, a Lorentz scalar and the time component of a four‐vector. We show that the scalar potential has effects on the motion of a particle that are distinctively different from those of a four‐vector potential. With the aid of an example we show that, in both classical and quantum mechanics, there are two inequivalent but compatible criteria of nonrelativistic behavior: (mean) kinetic energy much smaller than rest energy and nonrelativistic potential energy independent of total energy. The second of these is the correct condition for use of nonrelativistic methods, but it is the first that is usually invoked to justify their use. The two criteria are equivalent only when the scalar potential has a (mean) value much less in magnitude than the particle’s rest energy. If this condition is not satisfied, nonrelativistic formalisms such as ordinary Newtonian mechanics and the Schrödinger equation may be inadequate even if v/c is small. On the other hand, it is possible that a large S may permit relativistic energy relations to be written in a nonrelativistic form even if v/c is not small. Such an influence of the size of the scalar potential on what is considered nonrelativistic behavior is unfamiliar and is rarely mentioned in textbooks and other publications. In our opinion, it should be better known.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 1981
Papers|
January 01 1981
Lorentz‐invariant potentials and the nonrelativistic limit
Ingram Bloch;
Ingram Bloch
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235
Search for other works by this author on:
Horace Crater
Horace Crater
Department of Physics, University of Tennessee Space Institute, Tullahoma, Tennessee 37388
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 49, 67–75 (1981)
Citation
Ingram Bloch, Horace Crater; Lorentz‐invariant potentials and the nonrelativistic limit. Am. J. Phys. 1 January 1981; 49 (1): 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12613
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Ergodic Lagrangian dynamics in a superhero universe
I. L. Tregillis, George R. R. Martin
A simple Minkowskian time-travel spacetime
John D. Norton
Kepler's Moon puzzle—A historical context for pinhole imaging
Thomas Quick, Johannes Grebe-Ellis
The surprising subtlety of electrostatic field lines
Kevin Zhou, Tomáš Brauner
All objects and some questions
Charles H. Lineweaver, Vihan M. Patel
An undergraduate lab experiment on matched filtering as used in gravitational wave detection
Michael Daam, Antje Bergmann, et al.
Related Content
Toward an understanding of the spin-statistics theorem
American Journal of Physics (April 1998)
Illustrating some implications of the conservation laws in relativistic mechanics
American Journal of Physics (June 2009)
Lorentz-invariant three-vectors and alternative formulation of relativistic dynamics
Am. J. Phys. (March 2010)
Blackbody radiation in classical physics: A historical perspective
American Journal of Physics (July 2018)
GRB afterglows in the nonrelativistic phase
AIP Conference Proceedings (October 2008)