A classroom dialog form is used for a discussion of the question “What is reality?” It is agreed that a concept of reality which goes beyond immediate experience of phenomena is required. Empirical confirmation of expected properties is proposed as a reality criterion for physics. An allegation of falseness of physicists' reality concepts is made, with assertion of inadequacy for experiences of most people. A partial resolution is found in possible eventual description by a basic physical science. However, individuality among human beings suggests a role for humanists that is irreducible to that of scientists. Although the success of mathematics in physics supports a view that nature is essentially mathematical, the nature of mathematics and its comparative lack of success in some branches of science lead to a contrary position. A further argument is made from quantum physics that the inability of quantum theory to predict individual events argues against a completely mathematical character of physical reality. There is an analogy with individuality in human behavior, even though present-day science gives no information of connection. Mathematical properties are notable for a large domain of natural phenomena, but with apparent barriers to unlimited extension, in favor of fluctuation and diversity.

This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.