When a rigid right-angled lever experiences equal and opposite torques as measured by an observer O′ at rest with respect to the lever in frame S′, the usual transformation of these torques to another Lorentz frame S makes it appear that the torques are not balanced for an observer 0 at rest in S. This paradox was first pointed out by Lewis and Tolman. The consensus among textbook authors is that a net torque does exist on the lever according to the general Lorentz observer. The present paper is a basic reexamination of both the Lewis-Tolman lever paradox and another, closely related, paradox: equal and opposite torques applied at the same point on a rigid square. The basic approach herein is to construct for observer O a four-tensor to represent the relative four-torque about a point P′ fixed in frame S′ which has a constant speed along the axis of S. For some unknown reason, this tensor seems never to have been defined before. The space part of reduces to the corresponding classical definition of torque in three-space if . Based on a comparison of the torque components for two different Lorentz observers shows that no torque exists on the square or on the lever for any Lorentz observer if no net torque exists for the observer at rest with respect to the square or lever. This analysis suggests a new (covariant) definition for the torque about a point in three-space: , where is the space part of the four-vector and where is the space part of the four-vector . Here, a force is applied at a point (stationary in S′) whose displacement from (also stationary in S′) is 1. Both the force and the displacement 1 are as measured by observer O at rest in S; and is the torque about according to O.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1970
PAPERS|
March 01 1970
The Lewis-Tolman Lever Paradox
J. W. Butler
J. W. Butler
U. S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D. C. 20390
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 38, 360–368 (1970)
Article history
Received:
July 17 1969
Citation
J. W. Butler; The Lewis-Tolman Lever Paradox. Am. J. Phys. 1 March 1970; 38 (3): 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1976326
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
Playing with active matter
Angelo Barona Balda, Aykut Argun, et al.
All objects and some questions
Charles H. Lineweaver, Vihan M. Patel
A simple model of a gravitational lens from geometric optics
Bogdan Szafraniec, James F. Harford
A simplified relativity experiment
David P. Jackson, Fedya Grishanov, et al.
Related Content
Energy and momentum in special relativity
Am. J. Phys. (November 2008)
Some Applications of the Brehme Diagram
American Journal of Physics (April 1963)
Thomas precession and torque
Am. J. Phys. (March 2015)
Consequences of a generalized law of the lever
Am. J. Phys. (January 2009)
Superluminal motions in special relativity
AIP Conference Proceedings (March 1999)