An alternative calculational procedure for quantum theory is presented, employing three features which differ from the corresponding features of orthodox quantum theory. These are: (1) the state vector is never to be “reduced”; (2) quantum theory only makes predictions about ensembles of identical experiments (not about individual experiments); and (3) the measuring apparatus must always be included in the state vector. What is new about this alternative theory is the demonstration that Features 2 and 3 (which have hitherto been discussed separately) can be consistently combined to yield an interpretation of quantum theory which has the additional advantage of Feature 1. It is shown that alternative and orthodox theories yield identical predictions for any practical experiment. However, two classes of experiments (which are impractical) for which the orthodox and alternative theories yield different predictions are described. Therefore, it is, in principle, possible to decide which theory Nature has chosen to obey. It is concluded that there is no reason, based upon experimental evidence, for preferring one theory over the other.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 1967
PAPERS|
August 01 1967
Alternative to the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Theory
Philip Pearle
Philip Pearle
Lyman Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 35, 742–753 (1967)
Article history
Received:
September 26 1966
Connected Content
A related article has been published:
Comment on: “Alternative to the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Theory”
A related article has been published:
Comment on: “Alternative to the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Theory”
Citation
Philip Pearle; Alternative to the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Theory. Am. J. Phys. 1 August 1967; 35 (8): 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1974230
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
The physics of “everesting” on a bicycle
Martin Bier
All objects and some questions
Charles H. Lineweaver, Vihan M. Patel
It is time to honor Emmy Noether with a momentum unit
Geoff Nunes, Jr.
Resource Letter: Synthesis of the elements in stars
Artemis Spyrou
Exploration of the Q factor for a parallel RLC circuit
J. G. Paulson, M. W. Ray
A simplified relativity experiment
David P. Jackson, Fedya Grishanov, et al.
Related Content
Retrocausal Effects As A Consequence of Orthodox Quantum Mechanics Refined To Accommodate The Principle Of Sufficient Reason
AIP Conference Proceedings (November 2011)
Response to “Comment on ‘Nonlocal character of quantum theory,’ ” by Abner Shimony and Howard Stein [Am. J. Phys. 69 (8), 848–853 (2001)]
American Journal of Physics (August 2001)
Bell’s theorem and the foundations of quantum physics
American Journal of Physics (April 1985)
Do we really understand quantum mechanics? Strange correlations, paradoxes, and theorems
American Journal of Physics (June 2001)
Quantum Mechanics, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Correlated Statistical Mechanics
AIP Conference Proceedings (February 2007)