A critical analysis is made of Descartes's ideas concerning the nature of light and its refraction in order to ascertain the logic of his conclusion that light travels with a greater velocity in water than in air. The conclusions are (1) that Descartes was not an adherent of an emission theory but conceived of light as a pressure in a transparent medium, (2) that he believed this pressure was transmitted from the light source at an incredibly rapid but nevertheless finite velocity, and (3) that he was led to his erroneous conclusion concerning the velocity of light in rare and dense media by confusing the pressure and the velocity of the light propagation in the explanation of his experimental results.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1966 American Association of Physics Teachers.
1966
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.